Favorite Equation Of All Time?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter imagenius128
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around participants sharing their favorite mathematical equations or values, exploring various equations from different fields of mathematics and physics. The scope includes theoretical, conceptual, and personal reflections on the significance of these equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express admiration for Euler's identity, e^{i\pi} + 1 = 0, highlighting its connection to fundamental constants and operations.
  • Others favor Stokes' Theorem, emphasizing its elegance in differential forms.
  • A participant mentions the time-independent Schrödinger equation, noting its deceptively simple form.
  • Some participants propose alternative equations, such as the golden ratio and various integral representations, appreciating their elegance and proofs.
  • There are playful contributions, including humorous or unconventional equations like 1=2 and 0 ≠ 1.
  • Participants discuss the significance of Feynman's appreciation for certain equations, prompting reflections on their personal connections to these mathematical ideas.
  • Corrections are made regarding the interpretation of Euler's identity, with some participants clarifying misconceptions about its formulation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express diverse preferences for different equations, indicating multiple competing views without a clear consensus on a single favorite equation.

Contextual Notes

Some equations are presented with varying degrees of mathematical rigor, and participants express differing levels of appreciation for the elegance or significance of these equations. The discussion includes playful and serious contributions, reflecting personal tastes and interpretations.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in mathematics, physics, and the philosophical implications of mathematical concepts may find this discussion engaging.

imagenius128
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What is your favorite mathematical equation/value of all time? Mine is e[tex]^{i\pi}[/tex], which equals -1.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I second that.
 
I've always had a soft spot for Stokes' Theorem; differential forms version:
\int_{\partial \cal C} \omega = \int_{cal C} d\omega
 
j = gmpy.divm(xyz[1]**(gen)-dp,yx,xyz[1]**(gen))//xyz[1]**(gen-ONE)
 
x2-2x+3
 
[tex]d=\left|\frac{ax_1+by_1+c}{\sqrt{a^2+b^2}}\right|[/tex]

- perpendicular distance between a point (x1,y1) and a line ax+by+c=0

I reckon the proof is so neat! Except no one else in my class appreciated it whatsoever when they learned it...
 
I would like to change my original thought.

May favourite is by far this:

[tex]\int_{all time}dt[/tex]
 
Ok I'll post one just for fun. :)[tex]f(x) = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \, \left\{ \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} f(\lambda) \, e^{-i 2 \pi \omega \lambda} \, d\lambda \right\} \, e^{i 2 \pi \omega x} \, d\omega[/tex]
 
call me a traditionalist, but its got to be E=mc^2
its engraved on my ipod :)
 
  • #10
how about functions expressed using Hankel's wacky contour:

[tex]\Gamma(z) = \frac{1}{e^{2\pi iz}-1}\int^{+\infty}_{+\infty}e^{-t}t^{z-1}dt[/tex]

[tex]\zeta(s) = \frac{\Gamma(1-s)}{2\pi i}\int^{+\infty}_{+\infty}\frac{(-x)^s}{e^{x}-1}\frac{dx}{x}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #11
1=2.
 
  • #12
Mine is

All Time = 3pi/2 + 5
 
  • #13
y = xx. It has a minimimum at x = 1/e.
 
  • #14
Why does everyone love e^i*pi = -1 so much? Because Feynman liked it? Have some originality, people :)
 
  • #15
^IttyBittyBit: I didn't know that Feynman liked it - where did you read that from? Now I've more reason to like it. Coincidentally, it's the 15th of February today. He passed away exactly 22 years ago. :(

I like it for the traditional reason though, that there's e, i, pi, 0 and 1, ^, *, +, = in a single equation!
 
  • #16
IttyBittyBit said:
Why does everyone love e^i*pi = -1 so much? Because Feynman liked it? Have some originality, people :)

How about

[tex] 0 \neq 1[/tex]

Without this, maybe mathematics would not exist? :smile:

One of my lecturers in quantum field theory said that the most important (consider path integrals) equation in physics is

[tex] \log(\det(A)) =\mathrm{tr}\log(A)[/tex]

One of my personal favourites are

EDIT: A picture was supposed to appear here... Anyway, it was the formula that expresses e as a continued fraction. I won't bother to write it myself.

Torquil
 
Last edited:
  • #17
e[tex]^{i\pi}+1=0[/tex]

This has been described as the mathematical poem, linking the sometime called big five of mathematics, e, pi, i, 0 and 1. When you consider that it involves an irrational number raised to an imaginary irrational power being equal to unity, it is, at first sight, to a non mathematician like myself, truly magical. Of course when you know a little more mathematics it is quite simple, no magic involved.

Matheinste.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
uart said:
Ok I'll post one just for fun. :)


[tex]f(x) = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \, \left\{ \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} f(\lambda) \, e^{-i 2 \pi \omega \lambda} \, d\lambda \right\} \, e^{i 2 \pi \omega x} \, d\omega[/tex]


I'll second this one.
 
  • #19
My favourite would be the time-independent Schrödinger equation

[tex]\hat{H} \psi = E\psi[/tex]​

in this deceptively simple form :p
 
  • #20
matheinste said:
e[tex]^{i\pi}-1=0[/tex]

This has been described as the mathematical poem, linking the sometime called big five of mathematics, e, pi, i, 0 and 1. When you consider that it involves an irrational number raised to an imaginary irrational power being equal to unity, it is, at first sight, to a non mathematician like myself, truly magical. Of course when you know a little more mathematics it is quite simple, no magic involved.

Uhm i think you got that one wrong. e^(i*pi) = -1 , not +1
 
  • #21
Svalbard said:
Uhm i think you got that one wrong. e^(i*pi) = -1 , not +1

Thanks for the correction.

Matheinste
 
  • #22
ephedyn said:
^IttyBittyBit: I didn't know that Feynman liked it - where did you read that from? Now I've more reason to like it. Coincidentally, it's the 15th of February today. He passed away exactly 22 years ago. :(

I believe it was in the 'algebra' chapter of The Feynman Lectures on Physics. That book is worth reading even for people who are not interested in physics (as is every other book by Feynman).
 
  • #23
[tex]\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx=F(b)-F(a)[/tex]
 
  • #24
I find these definitions of the golden ratio very elegant:

[tex]\phi = \sqrt{1 + \sqrt{1 + \sqrt{1 + \cdots}}}[/tex]
[tex]\phi = 1 + \frac{1}{1 + \frac{1}{1 + \frac{1}{\ddots}}}[/tex]

The proofs of these are interesting as well.
 
  • #25
matheinste said:
e[tex]^{i\pi}+1=0[/tex]

This has been described as the mathematical poem, linking the sometime called big five of mathematics, e, pi, i, 0 and 1. When you consider that it involves an irrational number raised to an imaginary irrational power being equal to unity, it is, at first sight, to a non mathematician like myself, truly magical. Of course when you know a little more mathematics it is quite simple, no magic involved.

Matheinste.

Not only does it relate the major constants it does so by using all of the basic operations, exponentiation, multiplication, addition and equality.
 
  • #26
Yeah, I like this one, too.
[tex]e^{i\pi}+1=0[/tex]
You raise an irrational number to a power that is an imaginary multiple of another irrational number, add 1 and get 0.
 
  • #27
[tex]G_{\mu \nu}= 8 \pi T_{\mu \nu}[/tex]

Golden.
 
  • #28
torquil said:
How about

[tex] 0 \neq 1[/tex]

Without this, maybe mathematics would not exist? :smile:

That's the opposite of an equation :p

The trace/determinant log formula is pretty cool when applied to lie algebras and lie groups (which allegedly is used in physics)

I personally like

[tex]A / ker \phi \cong I am \phi[/tex]
 
  • #29
1=2 :-p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K