Femicide in Congo: Eve Ensler's Testimony

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LowlyPion
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the issue of femicide in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, as highlighted by Eve Ensler's testimony regarding the systematic violence against women during the ongoing conflict. Participants explore the broader implications of this violence, including its historical context and the role of international intervention.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Eve Ensler describes the extreme violence against women in Congo, labeling it as "femicide" and an economic war fought on women's bodies.
  • Some participants reference statistics on civilian deaths and the ongoing humanitarian crisis, noting that many deaths result from hunger and disease rather than direct violence.
  • There are discussions about the historical exploitation of Congo and comparisons to other regions affected by similar violence, such as Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the effectiveness of international intervention and criticize the motivations behind foreign involvement in Congo.
  • Others share personal initiatives, such as sponsoring individuals or supporting microloan projects, as a way to contribute positively to the situation in Africa.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with some agreeing on the severity of the situation in Congo while others debate the effectiveness of international responses and the historical context of exploitation. No consensus is reached on the best course of action or the motivations behind foreign involvement.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the situation, including the interplay of historical exploitation, ongoing violence, and the challenges of humanitarian aid. There are references to various statistics and historical events that remain unresolved in terms of their implications for current actions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying humanitarian crises, international relations, or gender-based violence, as well as individuals looking for ways to contribute to social change in conflict-affected regions.

LowlyPion
Homework Helper
Messages
3,127
Reaction score
6
CNN said:
Woman: 'They wanted to destroy my body and spirit'
By John Blake

(CNN) -- Eve Ensler can't find the right words to describe what she's seen and heard.

"Obscene. Horrible. Out of control..." The activist tosses out a cluster of angry words, trying to describe what is, in some ways, indescribable.

She talks about a woman being gang-raped by 15 soldiers. Some violated with sticks and knives. Cannibalism. She has returned from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where thousands of women and girls have been systematically raped during a 10-year war that some say has cost more lives than any other war since World War II.

"It's 'femicide,' " Ensler says, using another word to describe the treatment of Congolese women. "It's the systematic destruction of women. It's an economic war fought on the bodies of women. It's the destruction of the Congolese people and life itself."

... Congo's future, she says, may look even more frightening than its past.

"What's going on in the Congo is so extreme and so out of control," she says, "that if we don't intervene on behalf of women there, it will spread and something much more horrible will happen.

"You cannot let something that inhuman go on."
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/africa/10/15/congo.women/index.html?iref=mpstoryview
 
Physics news on Phys.org
International Rescue Committee's program in the Dem. Republic of Congo (it's not very democratic).
http://www.theirc.org/where/the_irc_in_democratic_republic_of_congo.html

Rape Victims’ Words Help Jolt Congo Into Change
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/18/world/africa/18congo.html

Rape Epidemic Raises Trauma of Congo War
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/07/world/africa/07congo.html


World Briefing | Africa: Congo: War's Death Toll At 3.8 Million - NY Times, December 10, 2004
By Dec 2004, more than 31,000 civilians were dieing each month.

Congo’s Death Rate Unchanged Since War Ended (the 'formal' war ended, now it's just fighting) - NYTimes, January 23, 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/23/world/africa/23congo.html
The survey, released Tuesday, estimated that 45,000 people continue to die every month, about the same pace as in 2004, when the international push to rebuild the country had scarcely begun. Almost all the deaths come from hunger and disease, signs that the country is still grappling with the aftermath of a war that gutted its infrastructure, forced millions to flee and flattened its economy.

In all, more than 5.4 million people have died in Congo since the war began in 1998, according to the most recent survey’s estimate, the latest in a series completed by the International Rescue Committee, an American aid organization. Nearly half of the dead were children younger than 5 years old.

I met Dr Richard Brennan (Director Health Programs, International Rescue Committee) two years ago at a function in which IRC's work and that of others was discussed. Brennan mentioned the Congo. Except for total number dead, the statistics haven't decreased in the DRC.

Dr Peter Salama informed members that the major cause of death within war-torn regions was not in fact due to weapon related injuries as many may have thought, rather high mortality rates are due to people being unable to access clean and sanitized water, resulting in fatal cases of diarrhea and measles. Shockingly, in the case of Afghanistan during 2001, these were responsible for 31% and 21% of deaths respectively.

Reinforcing the importance of sanitization, Dr Richard Brennan’s group, the International Rescue Committee (IRC), directs 25% of their funds towards providing healthcare and clean water around the globe. Unlike aid agencies that are focused on dealing with emergency crises, such as Medicins Sans Frontieres and the Red Cross, the IRC works with effected communities and regions for an average of 9-10 years. With operations in 25 countries, it is an organization geared towards enabling people to rebuild their lives by providing education, training and economic assistance.
Fortunately this is still up - http://www.advance.org/en/art/?438 - mp3's and ppt's of the presentations are available if anyone is interested.

IRC has a remarkable history - http://www.theirc.org/about/history.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unfortunately it only has around 150M barrels of oil reserves so it's going to be a while before we get around to democratising it.
 
mgb_phys said:
Unfortunately it only has around 150M barrels of oil reserves so it's going to be a while before we get around to democratising it.
I hope you are wrong. I hope that our government is purged of neo-cons who will cooperate with murderers as long as profits for their handlers are secured.

This is not new, people. The governments of central and south America have been infiltrated, influenced, and yes subverted for many decades by the US using the CIA and other agencies to enable the rape of their natural resources, much as France, Spain, and England did to North America until our citizenry grew strong enough to push back.
 
Congo Free State / Belgian Congo / Republic of the Congo / Léopoldville / Zaire / Democratic Republic of the Congo, is rather the poster child for screwed over little African country.
 
turbo-1 said:
I hope you are wrong. I hope that our government is purged of neo-cons who will cooperate with murderers as long as profits for their handlers are secured.

This is not new, people. The governments of central and south America have been infiltrated, influenced, and yes subverted for many decades by the US using the CIA and other agencies to enable the rape of their natural resources, much as France, Spain, and England did to North America until our citizenry grew strong enough to push back.

he's not wrong. fwiw, the atrocities described in this thread are a lot like what went on in Serbia/Croatia a few years back. and believe it or not, it doesn't seem to matter who's in office. during the Clinton administration, the fastest genocide in recorded history took place in Rwanda, where during a period of only 100 days, 800,000 people were systematically slaughtered, most with simple machetes. it wasn't until footage of bodies floating down the rivers into neighboring countries that the US and other nations stopped pretending they didn't know what was going on. the UN had "peacekeepers" there, they knew exactly the situation. i strongly suggest this book by Samantha Power for a fairly even-handed analysis of the problem: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0060541644/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
I guess Bono isn't doing enough. Seriously, what can be done about Africa.

I am sponsoring this girl. But she is from Zambia.
 

Attachments

  • t1090420080000002007lu.jpg
    t1090420080000002007lu.jpg
    3.4 KB · Views: 383
Last edited:
Greg Bernhardt said:
I guess Bono isn't doing enough. Seriously, what can be done about Africa.

I am sponsoring this girl. But she is from Zambia.
That's wonderful, Greg. My cousin has been putting $25 a week into a microloan project, and he's been emailing pictures of loan recipients, their businesses, repayment rates, etc. It's pretty neat.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K