Fermat's Little Theorem and Exponential Congruences

  • Thread starter Thread starter kmeado07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Fermat's Little Theorem states that for a prime number p, n^p is congruent to n modulo p for all integers n. The theorem can be derived from the equation n^(p-1) is congruent to 1 modulo p, applicable when p does not divide n. To extend this to cases where p divides n, one can multiply both sides of the congruence by n, confirming the theorem holds universally for all integers n. This approach clarifies the relationship between n, p, and modular arithmetic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with Fermat's Little Theorem
  • Basic algebra with exponents
  • Knowledge of prime numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of Fermat's Little Theorem in detail
  • Explore applications of modular arithmetic in cryptography
  • Learn about the Chinese Remainder Theorem
  • Investigate properties of prime numbers and their significance in number theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory and modular arithmetic applications.

kmeado07
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



From fermat's little theorem deduce that when p is prime,

n^p is equivalent to n (mod p)

for all integers n.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I know from Fermat's Little Theorem that ,

n^(p-1) is equivalent to 1 (mod p),

but i don't know how to use it for this particular question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If a is equivalent to b mod(p) then c*a is equivalent to c*b mod(p). What might be a good choice for c in your problem?
 
ok, so in my question, c=n ?
So by dividing by n i would get,

1^p is equiavlent to 1 (mod p)

How do i reach n^(p-1) on the left hand side?
 
n^p divided by n IS NOT 1^p. PLEASE stop and review algebra with exponents before you try to continue.
 
sorry, silly mistake.
dividing by n would give me,

n^(p-1) equivalent to 1 (mod p)

which is fermat's little theorem. so is this all i need to do?
 
This is ok if p doesn't divide n, but the question asks me for all integers n.
So how do i show it's also true for when p divides n?
 
kmeado07 said:
This is ok if p doesn't divide n, but the question asks me for all integers n.
So how do i show it's also true for when p divides n?

You actually want to go the other way. Start with Fermat's little theorem and then go to your conclusion. Multiply by n, you can always do that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K