"Fermat's" proof to Fermat's Last Theorem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter e2m2a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A participant claims to have discovered a proof for Fermat's Last Theorem that is concise, spanning only a page and a half, and utilizes mathematical concepts known during Fermat's lifetime. The discussion highlights skepticism regarding the validity of such a brief proof, emphasizing the historical context and the extensive prior attempts to solve the theorem. Suggestions include submitting the proof to a mathematical journal for peer review, as this would provide a formal platform for evaluation and critique.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermat's Last Theorem
  • Familiarity with historical mathematical proofs
  • Knowledge of mathematical publishing processes
  • Basic skills in mathematical writing and presentation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical context of Fermat's Last Theorem
  • Learn about the process of submitting mathematical papers to journals
  • Study previous attempts at proving Fermat's Last Theorem
  • Explore mathematical peer review practices
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers in number theory, and anyone interested in the history and challenges of proving Fermat's Last Theorem.

e2m2a
Messages
354
Reaction score
13
I have found a proof for Fermat's Last Theorem that only takes up a page and a half. I think it is a candidate proof for "Fermat's proof." It only involves math that was known during or prior to Fermat's time. Not sure what would be the best way to get it out there. Should I publish a book on it, submit the proof to a mathematical journal, or just post it on this website for all to see and review. Any suggestions, anyone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is very unlikely that you have found "a proof for Fermat's Last Theorem that only takes up a page and a half". Something that brief has almost certainly been tried before and found wanting. How long have you been working on it? What have you done to try to find flaws in it? What historical attempts have you consulted? Why has everyone else failed to see such a short simple proof?

I suppose it may be possible to discuss it here as a math exercise - "where did I do wrong?"
But I'll reserve that decision for a moderator.
 
Yes please submit the proof to a mathematical journal. Good luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K