MHB Find a recursive formula for the number of combinations

CStudent
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I have some question integrating between combinatorics and recursive formulas.Generally, I have some difficulty with the concept of recursion, as well as with the recursion in programming unfortunately.I have some question to solve, and maybe you can guide me:Find a recursive formula and a terminal condition for the number of words with the length 'n' that can be written by $A, B, C$, such that these combinations won't be shown: $AB, AC, BA, BC$.Now, I know that if we start from $A$ or $B$ we of course have one option, 'n' $A's$, 'n' $B's$ - which are two combinations.Now, if we start from $C$, I understand we have more 'n-1' letters to write such that we don't write the illegal ones.I know that means we have $a_{n-1}$ combinations after $C$.
But that is what I don't understand, what is that $a_{n-1}$, how do we know it really contains only the legal combinations?I wold love to get some sense of this concept.Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CStudent said:
I have some question integrating between combinatorics and recursive formulas.Generally, I have some difficulty with the concept of recursion, as well as with the recursion in programming unfortunately.I have some question to solve, and maybe you can guide me:Find a recursive formula and a terminal condition for the number of words with the length 'n' that can be written by $A, B, C$, such that these combinations won't be shown: $AB, AC, BA, BC$.Now, I know that if we start from $A$ or $B$ we of course have one option, 'n' $A's$, 'n' $B's$ - which are two combinations.Now, if we start from $C$, I understand we have more 'n-1' letters to write such that we don't write the illegal ones.I know that means we have $a_{n-1}$ combinations after $C$.
But that is what I don't understand, what is that $a_{n-1}$, how do we know it really contains only the legal combinations?I wold love to get some sense of this concept.Thanks.
If $a_n$ is the number of permissible words of length $n$, then you have shown that $a_n = 2 + a_{n-1}$. (In fact, there is only one word starting with A, one word starting with B, and $a_{n-1}$ words starting with C.) That is the recursive formula. To complete the definition, you need to add that $a_1 = 3$. I'm guessing that this is what the question means by a terminal condition, though I would call it the initial condition. It simply says that there are three words of length 1, namely A, B and C.
 
Opalg said:
If $a_n$ is the number of permissible words of length $n$, then you have shown that $a_n = 2 + a_{n-1}$. (In fact, there is only one word starting with A, one word starting with B, and $a_{n-1}$ words starting with C.) That is the recursive formula. To complete the definition, you need to add that $a_1 = 3$. I'm guessing that this is what the question means by a terminal condition, though I would call it the initial condition. It simply says that there are three words of length 1, namely A, B and C.

Yes, but I have an obstacle in understanding the concept of the recursion...

Again, I don't understand how we can leap to $a_{n−1}$. Okay, after the first C, we have n-1 places, how does it tells us that has $a_{n−1}$? How do we know what is this $a_{n−1}$ at all?

Thank you.
 
CStudent said:
Yes, but I have an obstacle in understanding the concept of the recursion...

Again, I don't understand how we can leap to $a_{n−1}$. Okay, after the first C, we have n-1 places, how does it tells us that has $a_{n−1}$? How do we know what is this $a_{n−1}$ at all?

Thank you.
If the first letter is a C then there is no restriction on what the next letter can be. In other words, it's exactly equivalent to starting again, but with only $n-1$ places instead of $n$.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top