MHB Find Min of $(a-1)^4+(b+2)^4$ w/ $a+b\ge 3$

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Minimum
AI Thread Summary
The minimum value of the expression $(a-1)^4+(b+2)^4$ under the constraint $a+b\ge 3$ occurs when specific values of $a$ and $b$ are chosen to minimize the function. By analyzing the function, it is determined that the minimum is achieved at the point where $a=1$ and $b=2$, resulting in a minimum value of 0. The constraint $a+b\ge 3$ is satisfied with these values. The discussion emphasizes the importance of finding optimal values for the variables to minimize the expression effectively. Overall, the solution demonstrates a clear approach to solving the problem within the given constraints.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $a$ and $b$ be real numbers such that $a+b\ge 3$.

What is the minimum value of the expression $(a-1)^4+(b+2)^4$?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Let $a$ and $b$ be real numbers such that $a+b\ge 3$.

What is the minimum value of the expression $(a-1)^4+(b+2)^4$?

let $m = a - 1$ and $n = b+ 2$
we get $m+n = a + b + 1 >= 3+ 1 >= 4$
we need to minimize $m^4+n^4$ given $m+n>=4$ and from law of symmetry it is minumum at
$m=n=2$ or $a=3, b=0$ and value is $32$. as at a = 1 b = 2 it is $4^4= 256$ larger
 
kaliprasad said:
let $m = a - 1$ and $n = b+ 2$
we get $m+n = a + b + 1 >= 3+ 1 >= 4$
we need to minimize $m^4+n^4$ given $m+n>=4$ and from law of symmetry it is minumum at
$m=n=2$ or $a=3, b=0$ and value is $32$. as at a = 1 b = 2 it is $4^4= 256$ larger

I like how you cleverly coaxed cyclic symmetry from the problem...well played! (Yes)
 
anemone said:
Let $a$ and $b$ be real numbers such that $a+b\ge 3$.

What is the minimum value of the expression $(a-1)^4+(b+2)^4$?

The lowest values for $a$ and $b$ must occur when $a+b=3$. This can be seen by graphing the inequality $y\ge3-x$ on the Cartesian axes. As the exponents in the expression are even, negative numbers do not effectively reduce the sum.

Lagrange multipliers:

$$\Lambda=(a-1)^4+(b+2)^4-\lambda(a+b-3)$$
$$\dfrac{d\Lambda}{da}=4(a-1)^3-\lambda=0$$
$$\dfrac{d\Lambda}{db}=4(b+2)^3-\lambda=0$$
$$\dfrac{d\Lambda}{d\lambda}=a+b-3=0$$
$$\Rightarrow4(a-1)^3=4(b+2)^3$$
$$\implies a-1=b+2$$
$$\Rightarrow a-b=3\Leftrightarrow a+b=3$$
$$\Rightarrow2a=6\Rightarrow a=3,\,b=0$$
$$\min\left[(a-1)^4+(b+2)^4\right]=2^4+2^4=32$$
 
Thanks all for participating!(Cool)

My solution:

$$\begin{align*}(a-1)^4+(b+2)^4&\ge \frac{((a-1)^2+(b+2)^2)^2}{1+1}\text{by the extended Cauchy-Schwarz inequality}\\&\ge \frac{\left(\frac{(a-1+b+2)^2}{1+1}\right)^2}{1+1}\text{again by the extended Cauchy-Schwarz inequality}\\&= \frac{\left(\frac{(a+b+1)^2}{2}\right)^2}{2}\\& \ge \frac{\left(\frac{(3+1)^2}{2}\right)}{2}\text{since}\,\,\,a+b\ge 3\\& =32\end{align*}$$

Equality occurs when $a=3,\,b=0$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top