MHB Find Roles Filled w/ Dale or Margaret: 65 Chars

  • Thread starter Thread starter navi
  • Start date Start date
navi
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have been trying every possible process for this question:

For this problem, assume 10 males audition, one of them being Dale, 7 females audition, one of them being Margaret, and 4 children audition. The casting director has 3 male roles available, 1 female role available, and 2 child roles available.
1) How many different ways can these roles be filled if exactly one of Dale and Margaret gets a part?
2) What is the probability (if the roles are filled at random) of both Dale and Margaret getting a part?

For number 1, I have tried these permutations and none have worked:

Dale but not Margaret, P(9,2)P(6,1)P(4,2) + Margaret but not Dale, P(9,3)(1)P(4,2)
Dale, P(9,2)P(7,1)P(4,2) + Margaret, P(10,3)P(1)P(4,2) - Both Dale and Margaret,P(9,2)(1)P(4,2)
I also tried both by multiplying P(3,1) to denote the 3 roles Dale could get, but that did not work either.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
navi said:
I have been trying every possible process for this question:

For this problem, assume 10 males audition, one of them being Dale, 7 females audition, one of them being Margaret, and 4 children audition. The casting director has 3 male roles available, 1 female role available, and 2 child roles available.
1) How many different ways can these roles be filled if exactly one of Dale and Margaret gets a part?
2) What is the probability (if the roles are filled at random) of both Dale and Margaret getting a part?

For number 1, I have tried these permutations and none have worked:

Dale but not Margaret, P(9,2)P(6,1)P(4,2) + Margaret but not Dale, P(9,3)(1)P(4,2)
Dale, P(9,2)P(7,1)P(4,2) + Margaret, P(10,3)P(1)P(4,2) - Both Dale and Margaret,P(9,2)(1)P(4,2)
I also tried both by multiplying P(3,1) to denote the 3 roles Dale could get, but that did not work either.

One thing you might consider, which will give you more practice and greater confidence in your results, is to establish the ENTIRE distribution of possibilities. I'll give you one for free!

All Possibilities: (10 * 9 * 8) * (7) * (4 * 3) = 60,480
Neither: (9 * 8 * 7) * (6) * (4 * 3) = 36,288
Both: 3*(1 * 9 * 8) * (1) * (4 * 3) = 2,592
Margaret Only: (9 * 8 * 7) * (1) * (4 * 3) = 6,048
Dale Only: 3*(1 * 9 * 8) * (6) * (4 * 3) = 15,552
Check: 15,552 + 6,048 + 2,592 + 36,288 = 60,480. We probably missed nothing! :-)

Also, having specified the ENTIRE distribution, it may become almost trivial to answer any subsequent question.

P.S. You could simplify your life a little on this problem be realizing the children's roles have nothing to do with the probabilities and almost nothing to do with the counts. By "almost nothing", I mean that each of the results created by ignoring the children's roles is simply multiplied by 12 to accommodate this additional consideration.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top