MHB Find the limit of a sequence II

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Sequence
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Let the sequence ${x_n}$ be defined by $x_0=2$ and $x_n=\frac{x_{n-1}}{2}+\frac{1}{x_{n-1}}$ for $n \ge 1$.
Find the limit.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Let the sequence ${x_n}$ be defined by $x_0=2$ and $x_n=\frac{x_{n-1}}{2}+\frac{1}{x_{n-1}}$ for $n \ge 1$.
Find the limit.

[sp]The solving procedure for this type of problems is illustrated in...

http://mathhelpboards.com/discrete-mathematics-set-theory-logic-15/difference-equation-tutorial-draft-part-i-426.html#post2492

Writing the difference equation in the form...

$\displaystyle \Delta_{n} = a_{n+1} - a_{n} = \frac{1}{a_{n}} - \frac{a_{n}}{2} = f(a_{n})\ (1)$

... we discover that f(x) has two attractive fixed points in $x= \sqrt{2}$ and $x=- \sqrt{2}$. For both the fixed points the criteria for convergence are satisfied, so that for any $a_{0}< 0$ the sequence converges to $- \sqrt{2}$ and for any $a_{0}>0$ the sequence converges to $\sqrt{2}$...[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
lfdahl said:
Let the sequence ${x_n}$ be defined by $x_0=2$ and $x_n=\frac{x_{n-1}}{2}+\frac{1}{x_{n-1}}$ for $n \ge 1$.
Find the limit.

I recognize this one. ;)

Let $f(x)=x^2-2$.
Then the root is approximated using the Newton-Raphson method with:
$$x_n = x_{n-1} - \frac{f(x_{n-1})}{f'(x_{n-1})}
= x_{n-1} - \frac{x_{n-1}^2-2}{2x_{n-1}}
= \frac{x_{n-1}}{2}+\frac{1}{x_{n-1}}$$
In other words, the limit is $\sqrt 2$.
 
I like Serena said:
I recognize this one. ;)

Let $f(x)=x^2-2$.
Then the root is approximated using the Newton-Raphson method with:
$$x_n = x_{n-1} - \frac{f(x_{n-1})}{f'(x_{n-1})}
= x_{n-1} - \frac{x_{n-1}^2-2}{2x_{n-1}}
= \frac{x_{n-1}}{2}+\frac{1}{x_{n-1}}$$
In other words, the limit is $\sqrt 2$.

In fact the equation $f(x)=x^{2} - 2 = 0$ has two solutions, $x=\sqrt{2}$ and $x=-\sqrt{2}$, and the Newton-Raphson method converges to the positive or negative root according to the initial value $x_{0}$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Good job, well done chisigma and I like Serena! Thankyou very much for two different and very clever solutions indeed!:cool:

Here is an alternative approach by other:

We assume that the limit \[L=\lim_{n \to \infty }\left \{ x_n \right \}\] exists. Then
$x_n=\frac{x_{n-1}}{2}+\frac{1}{x_{n-1}}$ for $n \ge 1 \Rightarrow $

\[x_nx_{n-1}=\frac{x_{n-1}^{2}}{2}+1 \: \: \: for \: \: \: n\geq 1 \Rightarrow \lim_{n \to \infty }\left \{ x_nx_{n-1} \right \}=\lim_{n \to \infty }\frac{x_{n-1}^{2}}{2}+1 \Rightarrow L^2 = \frac{L^2}{2}+1 \Rightarrow L^2 = 2\]Therefore $L = \sqrt{2}$ or $L = -\sqrt{2}$.$x_0 = 2 > 0$ and if $x_n > 0$ then $x_{n+1}= \frac{x_n}{2}+\frac{1}{x_n} > 0 + 0 = 0$. Hence, by induction $x_n > 0$ for all $n \ge 0$. It follows that $L=\lim_{n \to \infty }\left \{ x_n \right \} \geq 0$. We conclude that the limit is $\sqrt{2}$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top