MHB Find Triplets to Satisfy $x+y+z+xy+yz+zx=xyz+1$

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Determine all triplets $(x,\;y,\:z)$ of positive integers such that $x \le y \le z$ and

$x+y+z+xy+yz+zx=xyz+1$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Determine all triplets $(x,\;y,\:z)$ of positive integers such that $x \le y \le z$ and

$x+y+z+xy+yz+zx=xyz+1$.

Hello.

(x+1)(y+1)(z+1)=2(1+xyz)

At a glance:

(1,0,0) \ (0,1,0) \ (0,0,1) \ (-1,-1,-1)

Only meets the two restrictions: (1,0,0)

Regards.
 
The above solution is not correct. The question asks for positive integers, and $0$ IS NOT POSITIVE!
$$2,4,13$$
$$2,5,8$$
$$3,3,7$$
 
mente oscura said:
Hello.

(x+1)(y+1)(z+1)=2(1+xyz)

At a glance:

(1,0,0) \ (0,1,0) \ (0,0,1) \ (-1,-1,-1)

Only meets the two restrictions: (1,0,0)

Regards.

Thanks for participating, mente oscura! But your answer isn't correct. I'm sorry.:(

eddybob123 said:
The above solution is not correct. The question asks for positive integers, and $0$ IS NOT POSITIVE!
$$2,4,13$$
$$2,5,8$$
$$3,3,7$$

Yes, those three are the only solutions but if you don't mind me asking, I would like to see how you approached the problem, sounds good to you?
 
anemone said:
Determine all triplets $(x,\;y,\:z)$ of positive integers such that $x \le y \le z$ and

$x+y+z+xy+yz+zx=xyz+1$.
[sp]If $x$ (the smallest of these numbers) is $\geqslant4$ then each of $x,y,z$ is $\leqslant\frac14yz$; and each of $xy,xz,yz$ is $\leqslant yz$. Therefore $x+y+z+xy+yz+zx \leqslant \frac{15}4yz$. But $xyz + 1>4yz > \frac{15}4yz$. So there cannot be any soluions with $x\geqslant4.$

If $x=2$ then the equation becomes $2yz+1 = yz + 3(y+z) + 2$, so that $yz - 3(y+z) = 1$, or $(y-3)(z-3) = 10$. The only positive integer solutions with $y\leqslant z$ are $(y-3,z-3) = (1,10)$ or $(2,5)$, giving $(y,z) = (3,13)$ or $(5,8).$

If $x=3$ then the equation becomes $3yz+1 = yz + 4(y+z) + 3$, so that $yz - 2(y+z) = 1$, or $(y-2)(z-2) = 5$. The only solution is $(y-2,z-2) = (1,5)$, giving $(y,z) = (3,7)$.

Thus the only solutions are those given by eddybob:$(x,y,z) = (2,3,13),\ (2,5,8),\ (3,3,7)$.[/sp]
 
Thank you Opalg for participating and also your well explained solution!

Solution provided by other:

Let $x-1=p$, $y-1=q$ and $z-1=r$, the equation may be written in the form $pqr=2(p+q+r)+4$, where $p,q,r$ are integers such that $r \ge q \ge p \ge 0$. Observe that $p=0$ is not possible, for then $0=2(p+q)+4$ which is impossible in non-negative integers. Thus we may write this in the form

$2 \left( \dfrac{1}{pq}+\dfrac{1}{qr}+\dfrac{1}{rp} \right) +\dfrac{4}{pqr}=1$.

If $p \ge 3$, then $q \ge 3$ and $r \ge 3$. Then left side is bounded by $\dfrac{6}{9}+\dfrac{4}{27}$ which is less than 1.

We conclude that $p=1$ or $p=2$.

Case I:

Suppose $p=1$. Then we have $qr=2(q+r)+6$ or $(q-2)(r-2)=10$. This gives $q-2=1, r-2=10$ or $q-2=2$ and $r-2=4$ (recall $r \ge q$). This implies $(p,q,r)=(1,3,12), (1,4,7)$

Case II:
If $p=2$, the equation reduces to $2qr=2(2+q+r)+4$ or $qr=q+r+4$. This reduces to $(q-1)(r-1)=5$. Hence $q-1=1$ and $r-1=5$ is the only solution. This yields $(p,q,r)=(2,2,6)$

Reverting back to $x, y, z$ we get three triplets $(x,y,z)=(2,4,13),(2,5,8),(3,3,7)$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top