MHB Find x- and y- Intercepts....3

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the x- and y-intercepts of the equation y = 8x^3 - 6x - 1. The y-intercept is determined to be (0, -1) by substituting x = 0 into the equation. For the x-intercept, the equation is set to zero, leading to 0 = 8x^3 - 6x - 1, but the user expresses difficulty in finding "nice" roots. The term "nice" roots refers to easily calculable or rational solutions. The conversation highlights the challenge of solving cubic equations for their x-intercepts.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Find the x- and y-intercepts.

y = 8x^3 - 6x - 1

Let x = 0

y = 8(0)^3 - 6(0) - 1

y = -1

The y-intercept is y = -1 and it takes place at the point
(0, -1).

To find the x-intercept, let y = 0.

0 = 8x^3 - 6x - 1

I am stuck here.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think this one has "nice" roots. :(
 
What do "nice" roots look like?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top