Finding a function for the parabola

  • Thread starter Thread starter Atran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Parabola
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the possibility of finding a quadratic function for the points (1, 1), (2, 2), and (3, 3). Despite attempting to fit these points into the quadratic equation y = ax^2 + bx + c, the results indicate that the points are nearly linear, yielding coefficients that suggest a linear relationship. The user notes that the calculations become complex, and the coefficients derived are very close to those of a linear function. The conversation highlights the challenge of fitting a quadratic function to points that are closely aligned in a linear fashion. Ultimately, it concludes that a true quadratic function cannot be accurately defined for these points.
Atran
Messages
93
Reaction score
1
Note: I don't need any answer, all I want to know is whether this question is possible.

Homework Statement


"What is the function of the parabola which has the points (1, 1) (2, 2) and (3, 3)?"
I just asked my teacher to get the question, It's not stated in my textbook.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


No idea! I don't get more than a linear function.

- - - - -

Thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
While the points look linear, sub the points into y=ax2+bx+c. You'll get three equations with three unknowns.
 
I did this and it turns out kinda ugly. I got 0 for the coefficient of the squared term (well, 1.5x 10^{-14} )I got 1 for the coefficient of the x term; and I got 3x10^{-14} for the constant. Looks pretty linear there...although not EXACTLY linear...but I may have made a mistake.

EDIT: I started this by hand and it got ugly quick. I used my TI89 with the rref function and that's what it got. Those points are in a line...it's difficult to force the quadratic on it because they are so close together. One could plug those coefficients into the Ax^2+Bx+C=0
formula and complete the square...It's REALLY close to linear...and the thing could open up or down...those points are too close together and linear to really make sense of...as far as I can tell...
 
Last edited:
At first it seemed very complicated, but when I uncovered the trick It was so easy.
Yes, I know that it's not possible to write a second-degree equation for a linear graph, therefore I had to use 'limit' as a positive integer 'n' approaching 0.
Thanks for the answers.
 
? An integer can't "approach" 0!
 
HallsofIvy said:
? An integer can't "approach" 0!

Sorry, I just meant a positive rational number.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top