MHB Finding a maclaurin series for a function with 'e'

Click For Summary
To find the Maclaurin series for the function f(x) = e^(x - 2), it is essential to recognize that the Maclaurin series is centered around x = 0, not x = 2. The correct approach involves expressing e^(x - 2) as e^(-2) * e^x. This leads to the series representation e^(-2) * Σ (x^n / n!), where the summation runs from n = 0 to infinity. Thus, the Maclaurin series for f(x) = e^(x - 2) is Σ (e^(-2) * x^n / n!).
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
I need to find the Maclaurin series for

$$f(x) = e^{x - 2}$$

I know that the maclaurin series for $f(x) = e^x$ is

$$\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n!}$$

If I substitute in $x - 2$ for x, I would get

$$\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(x - 2)^n}{n!}$$

However, this is wrong, according to the text. How can I fix this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tmt said:
I need to find the Maclaurin series for

$$f(x) = e^{x - 2}$$

I know that the maclaurin series for $f(x) = e^x$ is

$$\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n!}$$

If I substitute in $x - 2$ for x, I would get

$$\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(x - 2)^n}{n!}$$

However, this is wrong, according to the text. How can I fix this?

The reason it's considered wrong in the text is because you have a Taylor series centred around x = 2, while a MacLaurin series is strictly only centred around x = 0.

For this one $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathrm{e}^{x - 2} = \mathrm{e}^{-2}\,\mathrm{e}^x = \mathrm{e}^{-2}\,\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}{ \frac{x^n}{n!} } = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}{\frac{\mathrm{e}^{-2}\,x^n}{n!}} \end{align*}$.
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K