Finding a Min or Max point without knowing the function

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Max Point
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of the composite function h(x) = f(g(x)), where f(x) is a monotonically increasing function and g(x) has a local minimum at x=0. The application of the chain rule reveals that h'(0) = 0, indicating a critical point at x=0. Further analysis shows that h(x) is locally increasing for x > 0 and locally decreasing for x < 0, confirming that x=0 is a local minimum for h(x). The differentiability of the functions is not required to establish this conclusion, although f(x) influences the values of the extrema.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differentiable functions
  • Knowledge of the chain rule in calculus
  • Concept of local minima and maxima
  • Familiarity with monotonically increasing functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the chain rule in composite functions
  • Explore the properties of monotonically increasing functions
  • Learn about critical points and their classification in calculus
  • Investigate the effects of function transformations on extrema
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and optimization, as well as anyone interested in the behavior of composite functions and their critical points.

Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have this simple problem:

f(x) and g(x) are both differentiable. f is monotonically increasing for every x. g has a local min at x=0. we define h to be h(x)=f(g(x)).

Can we say anything about x=0 for h(x) ?

I used the chain rule to find that h'(x) = f'(g(x))*g'(x). at x=0 g'(x)=0, so h'(0) = 0 as well. is it possible to say if x=0 is min, max, or isn't is possible ?

thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We can tell that g(x) is locally increasing for x > 0. Therefore h(x) is locally increasing for x > 0 as well.
And g(x) is locally decreasing for x < 0, so h(x) is locally decreasing for x < 0 as well.
Consequently h(x) has a local minimum at x=0.
Differentiability of any of the functions is not needed.
 
right, so f has no effect on h ?
 
Yankel said:
right, so f has no effect on h ?

Well, f doesn't affect the locations of the extrema, but it does affect the value of those extrema.
And f will also affect the locations of zeroes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K