Finding a Precise Scale for Measuring Human Body Weight Fluctuations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of measuring human body weight fluctuations with high precision throughout the day. Participants explore the limitations of commercially available scales, the potential for modifying cheaper kitchen scales, and the technical aspects of using load cells for more accurate measurements. The conversation includes considerations of practical applications and the implications of such measurements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in measuring small fluctuations in body weight (in grams) throughout the day and notes the inadequacy of commercial scales that typically have a precision of 100 grams.
  • Another participant suggests that load cells could provide the necessary accuracy at a lower cost than $2500, mentioning a specific load cell with a range of 100 kg and an accuracy of 20 grams.
  • Concerns are raised about the mechanical design required to ensure accurate measurements without losing precision through the load path.
  • One participant acknowledges the difficulty of achieving 1-gram precision and notes the surprising cost increase for higher precision scales.
  • There is a discussion about the practical uses of measuring weight with high precision, including tracking weight loss during various activities, though one participant questions the overall utility of such precise measurements.
  • Another participant points out that the air breathed in and out does not affect the weight measured by the scale, but acknowledges that the chemical composition and temperature differences could have an impact.
  • Concerns are raised about the effects of body movements on weight measurements, suggesting that even small accelerations could lead to significant apparent weight changes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility of achieving high precision in weight measurement and the practical implications of such measurements. There is no consensus on the best approach or the utility of the measurements being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the mechanical design of weight measurement systems, the cost of achieving higher precision, and the effects of body movements on measurement accuracy. The discussion remains open-ended regarding the best methods and technologies for achieving the desired precision.

I_am_learning
Messages
681
Reaction score
16
I was lately interested in learning how the human body weight changes through out the day. Like, how much weight (may be in just 10s of grams) is lost during sleeping, after bathing, after workout and like that.
For that I would require a highly precise scale. But most commercially available scales' precision is only upto 100 grams which is not useful for my purpose. When I dug in further, some industrial scales do provide upto 10 grams precision but they (for 100 Kg max) cost in the range of $2500, which is every expensive.
I am looking for some cheaper means of measuring human body weight fluctuations precisely.
There are kitchen scales for just $10 which have precision of 1g but they can measure only upto around 5Kg.

I can see that its much more difficult (and hence expensive) to have the same precise measuring ability over a wide measurement range.

So, If my weight is going to fluctuate by, let's say only about +-2.5 kg, can I some-how modify the cheap kitchen scale to work around the point of my average body weight?

I do have electronics and micro-controller knowledge, but don't have any knowledge about the weight sensor.

And, at last, does anyone know about any research publication/works about this quantified changes of human body weight everyday?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be able to find a load cell that will meet that accuracy requirement cheaper that $2500.. For example this has a range of 100kg and accuracy 20g. That was the first one Google found, so you can probably do better.

http://www.robotshop.com/en/type-s-load-cell-100-kg.html
http://www.robotshop.com/media/files/pdf/datasheet-3138.pdf

The mechanical design of a system so you don't "lose" 20g through a load path that doesn't go through the load cell, is a another problem. That is easy if you are measuring tension in a rope, but not so easy if you want a stable platform to stand on. Maybe you need 4 load cells, one at each corner.

Of course if you get this to work, you may find it responds to the the accelerations caused by heart beats, as well as the "weight" you are trying to measure!
 
AlephZero said:
You should be able to find a load cell that will meet that accuracy requirement cheaper that $2500.. For example this has a range of 100kg and accuracy 20g. That was the first one Google found, so you can probably do better.

http://www.robotshop.com/en/type-s-load-cell-100-kg.html
http://www.robotshop.com/media/files/pdf/datasheet-3138.pdf

The mechanical design of a system so you don't "lose" 20g through a load path that doesn't go through the load cell, is a another problem. That is easy if you are measuring tension in a rope, but not so easy if you want a stable platform to stand on. Maybe you need 4 load cells, one at each corner.

Of course if you get this to work, you may find it responds to the the accelerations caused by heart beats, as well as the "weight" you are trying to measure!

Thanks. Seems like I need to improve my googling skills; I didn't know about 'Load cell' keyword, and was using 'scale' and wasn't getting desired results.
Now, I am getting lots of "load cell" results, but all of them have around 0.02% non-repeatability
which is 20g form 100kg, but maybe I am not searching right.
Its quite surprising that just for an increase form 100g (most commercial bath-scalse) to 20g precision, things start to get so expensive.
And, since most strain gauge have overload capacity of just 100%, I don't think I can use a 10kg scale and offset it to my avg. weight.

So, achieving like 1g precision seems impossible.
 
I_am_learning said:
Its quite surprising that just for an increase form 100g (most commercial bath-scalse) to 20g precision, things start to get so expensive.
Measuring anything to better than 0.1% precision is hard, and not a common requirement.

What use you can make of knowing the mass of an adult human, measured to the accuracy of 1cc of water (i.e. 1g) is another question, of course.
 
AlephZero said:
What use you can make of knowing the mass of an adult human, measured to the accuracy of 1cc of water (i.e. 1g) is another question, of course.

Lots of things could be done. Like, find out how much air you breathe in and out. How much weight you loose (possibly through perspiration) on hot sun. How much is lost after overnight sleep. etc

Whats the use of knowing all these, is actually what I can't answer. :) Just kill my curiosity, perhaps. :)
 
I_am_learning said:
Lots of things could be done. Like, find out how much air you breathe in and out.

The air you breathe in and out does not affect the down-force you exert on the scale. Air is neutrally buoyant in air, after all.
 
Last edited:
jbriggs444 said:
The air you breathe in and out does not affect the down-force you exert on the scale. Air is neutrally buoyant in air, after all.

The air you breathe out has a different chemical composition (more CO2, usually more water vapor) and is at a differerent temperature from the air you breathe in. So the buoyancy effects will make a difference.

But trying to measure weight to within 1g, I would be more concerned about random body movements. An acceleration of 10-5g is enough to cause a 1g apparent change in weight of a 100 kg mass. Compare that with the fact that if somebody is sitting on a cheap and not very rigid plastic chair, you can easily observe their heartbeat rate just by watching the motion of the chair as it deforms with each beat.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
43K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K