Finding Asymptotes for a Rational Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentallic
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the asymptotes of the rational function f(x) = (x + 4) / (x² - 4). Participants are exploring both vertical and horizontal asymptotes, as well as the implications of polynomial degrees in determining these asymptotes.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the identification of vertical asymptotes at x = ±2 and the need for clarification on horizontal asymptotes. There are attempts to relate the degrees of the numerator and denominator polynomials to the horizontal asymptote, with some participants expressing uncertainty about how these degrees affect the outcome.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and characteristics of asymptotes. Some participants have provided insights into how to determine horizontal asymptotes based on polynomial degrees, while others are questioning the nature of asymptotes in relation to function behavior, particularly when a function crosses an axis.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions of asymptotes, particularly in the context of crossing the x-axis and the implications for horizontal asymptotes. There is also mention of constraints regarding the range of the function, which remains unresolved.

Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95

Homework Statement


I am unsure how to find the asymptotes and thus, graph the function of -

[tex]f(x)=\frac{x+4}{x^{2}-4}[/tex]


Homework Equations


Such functions that have the same degree polynomial in both the numerator and denominator can be simplified to change the numerator from a variable in x, to a constant which helps to find the asymptotes.

e.g.

[tex]y=\frac{x-2}{x+5}[/tex]

[tex]y=\frac{(x+5)-7}{x+5}[/tex]

[tex]y=1-\frac{7}{x+5}[/tex]

Therefore it can be seen that there is an asymptote at y=1 - since the fraction [tex]\neq[/tex] 0 - and another at x=-5 since the denominator of the fraction [tex]\neq[/tex] 0



The Attempt at a Solution



The first asymptote is obvious, x=[tex]\pm[/tex]2 since the denominator [tex]\neq[/tex] 0

Then I split the function into a similar form as shown with the e.g.

[tex]f(x)=\frac{(x+2)+2}{(x+2)(x-2)}[/tex]

[tex]f(x)=\frac{1}{x-2}+\frac{2}{(x+2)(x-2)}[/tex]

but from here I'm unsure how to find the y asymptotes. Could someone please show me the solution, or point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well first you need to be more specific as to what you mean by "asymptote". You want both the horizontal and vertical asymptotes and the means by which both are obtained are quite different.

As you have said, the vertical asymptotes are [tex]x = \pm 2[/tex]. As for the horizontal asymptotes, note how the fraction is expressed. How is the degree of the numerator polynomial and that of the denominator polynomial related to the horizontal asymptote?
 
Defennder said:
Well first you need to be more specific as to what you mean by "asymptote".
Where the horizontal function approaches as [tex]x\rightarrow\pm\infty[/tex]? Isn't this the definition of an asymptote? A line which cannot be cut. As for horizontal asymptotes, they occur because a fractional part in the function cannot = 0, thus there cannot be a y value there.

Defennder said:
You want both the horizontal and vertical asymptotes and the means by which both are obtained are quite different.
I think the vertical asymptotes are obtained in the same way but as for the horizontal asymptotes, I'm not too sure.

Defennder said:
As for the horizontal asymptotes, note how the fraction is expressed. How is the degree of the numerator polynomial and that of the denominator polynomial related to the horizontal asymptote?
Sorry, I don't know how these polynomials of different degrees (quadratic and linear) affect the outcome of the horizontal asymptotes. You've already stated that they are obtained by another methods, but this is the only method I know of to tackle this new problem.


The attempt at a solution

Trying to use the same method to find the y asymptote as in my previous example of same degree polynomials in both numerator and denominator :

[tex]f(x)=\frac{1}{x-2}+\frac{2}{(x+2)(x-2)}[/tex]

Each fractional part [tex]\neq[/tex] 0.
The first part, [tex]\frac{1}{x-2}[/tex], cannot = 0, but [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] 0 as [tex]x \rightarrow \infty[/tex]. Therefore, this causes the second part [tex]\frac{2}{(x+2)(x-2)}[/tex] to approach 0 as well. So as [tex]x\rightarrow\pm\infty[/tex] : [tex]f(x)\rightarrow0[/tex]

Does this mean there is a horizontal asymptote at y=0?

Although, the function crosses the x-axis at -4. Is this still in the form of an asymptote?
 
Mentallic said:
Where the horizontal function approaches as [tex]x\rightarrow\pm\infty[/tex]? Isn't this the definition of an asymptote? A line which cannot be cut. As for horizontal asymptotes, they occur because a fractional part in the function cannot = 0, thus there cannot be a y value there.
The former is for a horiztonal asymptote, the latter is for a vertical asymptote. You have to be clear about which ones you are talking about here.

I think the vertical asymptotes are obtained in the same way but as for the horizontal asymptotes, I'm not too sure.
See above.

Sorry, I don't know how these polynomials of different degrees (quadratic and linear) affect the outcome of the horizontal asymptotes. You've already stated that they are obtained by another methods, but this is the only method I know of to tackle this new problem.

The attempt at a solution

Trying to use the same method to find the y asymptote as in my previous example of same degree polynomials in both numerator and denominator :

[tex]f(x)=\frac{1}{x-2}+\frac{2}{(x+2)(x-2)}[/tex]

Each fractional part [tex]\neq[/tex] 0.
The first part, [tex]\frac{1}{x-2}[/tex], cannot = 0, but [tex]\rightarrow[/tex] 0 as [tex]x \rightarrow \infty[/tex]. Therefore, this causes the second part [tex]\frac{2}{(x+2)(x-2)}[/tex] to approach 0 as well. So as [tex]x\rightarrow\pm\infty[/tex] : [tex]f(x)\rightarrow0[/tex]

Does this mean there is a horizontal asymptote at y=0?
You can arrive at this conclusion even without splitting up f(x). Just look at the degree of denominator polynomial and the numerator polynomial. If the degree of the former is greater than the latter, then when x approaches infinity, the bottom part of fraction would dominate and the function would tend to 0. Hence the horizontal asymptote at y = 0.

Although, the function crosses the x-axis at -4. Is this still in the form of an asymptote?
I don't know what you mean here. You mean instead the "y-axis"?
 
As for horizontal asymptotes, they occur because a fractional part in the function cannot = 0, thus there cannot be a y value there.
Defennder said:
the latter is for a vertical asymptote. You have to be clear about which ones you are talking about here.
Sorry I probably wasn't being very clear here. When I split up the function - [tex]y=\frac{x-2}{x+5}[/tex] : [tex]y=1-\frac{7}{x+5}[/tex] - The fraction part [tex]\neq[/tex] 0 so the range does not exist at y=1. This is how I came to terms with the horizontal asymptote at "that y value".


Defennder said:
You can arrive at this conclusion even without splitting up f(x). Just look at the degree of denominator polynomial and the numerator polynomial. If the degree of the former is greater than the latter, then when x approaches infinity, the bottom part of fraction would dominate and the function would tend to 0. Hence the horizontal asymptote at y = 0.
Yes that's true, thanks for the tip :smile:


Although, the function crosses the x-axis at -4. Is this still in the form of an asymptote?
Defennder said:
I don't know what you mean here. You mean instead the "y-axis"?

No I still mean x-axis.

[tex]f(x)=\frac{x+4}{x^{2}-4}[/tex]

when f(x)=0, x=-4. Therefore, the function intercepts the X-axis at (-4,0) and as [tex]x\rightarrow-\infty : f(x)\rightarrow0^{-}[/tex]

Now, since the function cuts the x-axis, does the asymptote still exist at y=0? (I thought asymptotes were lines that are never crossed, even though the function approaches infinitely close to them)


Also, I've found another issue which I can't seem to find the answer to:
The range is all reals discluding [tex]\approx -\frac{4}{5}<f(x)<-\frac{1}{10}[/tex].
Is it possible to find the exact range?
 
Mentallic said:
No I still mean x-axis.
Oh you're right. Apparently I misread. The x-axis is where y=0

Now, since the function cuts the x-axis, does the asymptote still exist at y=0? (I thought asymptotes were lines that are never crossed, even though the function approaches infinitely close to them)
Ok now this is where the definition of asymptote is involved. Does a line count as an asymptote if the function tends to it at infinity but crosses it at an earlier interval? I can't remember of the top of my head, but I'll say that you can consider it as an asymptote for a given interval.

Also, I've found another issue which I can't seem to find the answer to:
The range is all reals discluding [tex]\approx -\frac{4}{5}<f(x)<-\frac{1}{10}[/tex].
Is it possible to find the exact range?
Sure you can, if you don't mind leaving your answer in radicals.
 
Defennder said:
Ok now this is where the definition of asymptote is involved. Does a line count as an asymptote if the function tends to it at infinity but crosses it at an earlier interval? I can't remember of the top of my head, but I'll say that you can consider it as an asymptote for a given interval.

After a bit of scrounging, it seems that it is still asymptotic
wikipedia said:
A curve can intersect its asymptote, even infinitely many times.

Defennder said:
Sure you can, if you don't mind leaving your answer in radicals.

No of course not :smile:
I much prefer exact answers to good estimates when theoretical mathematics is involved.

The answer to the asymptotes have been found : [tex]x=\pm2[/tex], [tex]y=0[/tex].

However, before I put this thread to rest, how could I go about finding the range of the function?

Thanks for all your help Defennder.
 
Well to find the range, just set the function = r for example. Then re-arrange it into a quadratic equation in x. Note that the quadratic has to satisfy some condition if x is restricted to the reals. Use that condition to find the range.
 
I understood what you just said (how odd for me), but hopefully I can put it together -

[tex]f(x)=r[/tex]

Therefore, [tex]r=\frac{x+4}{x^{2}-4}[/tex]

[tex]rx^{2}-4r=x+4[/tex]

[tex]rx^{2}-x-4r-4=0[/tex]

[tex]x=\frac{1\pm\sqrt{1-4r(-4r-4)}}{2r}[/tex]

So um...?

EDIT: The condition for the range that does not exist is when the discriminant < 0

Therefore, [tex]1-4r(-4r-4)<0[/tex]

[tex]16r^{2}+16r+1<0[/tex]

[tex]r=\frac{-16\pm\sqrt{16^{2}-4.16}}{2.16}[/tex]

[tex]r=\frac{-2\pm\sqrt{3}}{4}[/tex]

Since the parabola is concave up (a>0) and r is the roots, it is all values between the x values between the vertex and roots. i.e.

[tex]\frac{-2-\sqrt{3}}{4}<R<\frac{-2+\sqrt{3}}{4}[/tex]

This looks right to me. Thanks defennder.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K