MHB Finding Integer Solutions for a Fifth Degree Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathland
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding integer solutions for the equation x^5 - 15x^3 - x - 60 = 0. Participants highlight the use of the rational root theorem to identify potential integer solutions, emphasizing that any rational root must be an integer due to the polynomial's structure. The integer divisors of 60 are suggested as candidates for testing in the equation. Ultimately, x = 4 is identified as the only integer solution after evaluating the possible roots. The conversation underscores the complexity of solving quintic equations and the utility of synthetic division for reducing the problem.
mathland
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Solve for x∈ℤ.

x^5-15x^3-x-60 = 0

How do I get started? I think the solution is not over the real numbers.

You say?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathland said:
Solve for x∈ℤ.

x^5-15x^3-x-60 = 0

How do I get started? I think the solution is not over the real numbers.

You say?
This is a bit high level for you, isn't it? There is no way to solve a quintic equation in general, though there are some tricks you can employ. Graphically we can see how many real solutions there are. (There are three.)

Have you covered the "rational root theorem?" There is a rational (actually integer) solution you can find, but unless you use Excel or something it will be a bit of a hassle to get. Once you get that you can use synthetic division to reduce it to a quartic equation. There is a way to solve these (see the section "solution") but it's pretty hairy. Unless you need to find all of the roots I'd leave it with the integer solution.

-Dan
 
odd degree says the equation has to at least one real root. could be ...

1 real & 4 imaginary, or

3 real & 2 imaginary, or

all 5 real

rational root theorem shows there is one real root that is rational
 
The problem specifically says that you are to solve for x in Z, the set of integers, so, yes, the solution is not over the real numbers!

And the set of all integers is a subset of the set of rational number so I would start by using the
"rational root theorem" suggested by TopSquark and Klaas Van Aarsen.

The rational root theorem says that any rational root of the polynomial equation $\alpha_nx^n+ \alpha_{n-1}x^{n- 1}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ \alpha_1 x+ \alpha_0= 0$ is of the form $\frac{a}{b}$ where a divides $\alpha_0$ and b divides $\alpha_n$.

Here $\alpha_0= 1$ so the denominator must be 1- any rational root must be an integer. $\alpha_n= 60$ so any integer solution must be a divisor of 60. Such numbers are 1, -1, 2, -2, 3, -3, 4, -4, 6, -6, 10, -10, 12, -12, 15, -15, 30, -30, 60, and -60. Try those into the equation to see which, if any, of those actually satisfy the equation.
 
Thanks everyone.
 
I get x= 4 as the only integer solution.
I wrote a short program to evaluate the polynomial at the values of x above.
(I accidently left 5 and -5 from the list of possible roots but they are not actually roots.)
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top