Finding the Intersection of Two Planes using Vector Equations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 7K views
PeterSK
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two planes [itex]r_1[/itex] and [itex]r_2[/itex] have the equations:

[itex]r_1 = ( 1 - \lambda ) \underline{i} + ( 2 \lambda + \mu ) \underline{j} + ( \mu - 1 ) \underline{k}[/itex]

[itex]r_2 = ( s - t ) \underline{i} + ( 2s - 3 ) \underline{j} + ( t ) \underline{k}[/itex]

If a point lies in both [itex]r_1[/itex] and [itex]r_2[/itex] then [itex]\mu =4 \lambda + 3[/itex] (shown in a previous question)

Hence find a vector equation of the line of intersection of the two planes.

Homework Equations



None known

The Attempt at a Solution



I know what I have to do but I have no idea how to do it:
  • Find the normals of the planes
  • Use the cross (vector) product on them to get the direction of the intersection vector
  • find a point on the vector (I assume using the [itex]\mu = 4 \lambda + 3[/itex] stuff)
  • substitute the two parts into the formula for a vector equation to get the answer
However, I have no idea how to find the normals of those planes and I can also see finding the point to be awkward too with all those mu's, lambda's, s's and t's.
I'm just completely stumped!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Put the planes in the form Ax +By +C=0, eliminating the parameters in so doing, and the normals will be (A,B,C)
 
The only way I know of making that form is by doing the dot product of the plane and its normal which doesn't help as the normal is what I'm trying to find :confused:
 
If you have determined that [itex]\mu= 4\lambda + 3[/itex], that's all you need!

Replace [itex]\mu[/itex] by [itex]4\lambda + 3[/itex] it the equation for the first plane:
[itex]\vec{r_1}= (1- \lambda)\vec{i})+ (2\lambda + (4\lambda +3))\vec{j}+ ((4\lambda+ 3)- 1)\vec{k}[/itex]
[itex]\vec{r_1}= (1-\lambda)\vec{i}+ (6\lambda+ 3)\vec{j}+ k+ (4\lambda+ 2)\vec{k}[/itex]
That is the vector equation of the line satisfying [itex]\mu= 4\lambda+ 3[/itex]j- which you say is true for any point on the line of intersection.
 
Thanks a lot, that helped loads!
 
Sorry, but is that just the direction vector of the line of intersection?
If so, then do I need to make it into the form [itex]r = \underline{a} + \lambda \underline{c}[/itex] ?