Finding the Metric in Stereographic Projection

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the metric in X,Y coordinates from the stereographic projection of the sphere to the plane. Participants suggest starting with spherical coordinates and using transformations to derive the metric. The transformation from spherical coordinates to the XY plane is discussed, leading to the computation of the metric as a 2-form. There is an emphasis on the necessity of using two parameters for the 2-dimensional surface, and a suggestion to utilize the cotangent function for simplification. The conversation concludes with a realization of the geometric implications of the cotangent operator in relation to stereographic projection.
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
if we consider the stereographic projection \mathcal{S}^2\rightarrow \mathbb{R}^2 given in the form:

(X,Y) = \left( \frac{x}{1-z} , \frac{y}{1-z} \right)

how can I find the metric in X,Y coordinates?

-- Should I first express the projection in spherical coordinates, then find the inverse projection \mathbb{R}^2\rightarrow \mathcal{S}^2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hello mnb96! :smile:

start with spherical coordinates, and use a simplification for sin/(1 - cos) :wink:
 
I think they may be referring to the Riemannian metric. If this is so, then
the R-metric is a 2-form, so you just need to use the stereo projection
to pullback a 2-form.
 
oK, thanks to you both.
I tried the following:

I parametrized the S^2 sphere with coordinates (\theta,\phi), then I wrote down the transformation from the S^2 sphere (with spherical coordinates) to the XY plane (with polar coordinates):

R = \frac{\sin\theta}{1-\cos\theta}

\alpha = \phi

Then I simply used the polar->cartesian transformation to obtain:

X(\theta,\phi) = \frac{\sin\theta \cos\phi}{1-\cos\theta}

Y(\theta,\phi) = \frac{\sin\theta \sin\phi}{1-\cos\theta}

At this point I was ready to compute the metric as:

ds^2 = dX^2 + dY^2 = \frac{1}{(1-\cos\theta)^2} \left( d\theta^2 + \sin^2 \theta \cdot d\phi^2 \right)

Was this correct?
@tiny-tim: I don't know what you meant by simplification for sin(x)/(1-cos(x))
 
sinx/(1 - cosx) = 2sin(x/2)cos(x/2) / 2sin2(x/2) = cot(x/2) :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
sinx/(1 - cosx) = 2sin(x/2)cos(x/2)/2sin2(x/2) = cot(x/2) :wink:

Ah, you meant that! :redface:
Thanks!

-- However, the end of the story was that we were forced to use spherical coordinates because we needed to parametrize a 2-dimensional surface with two parameters, and not three-parameters x,y,z plus a quadratic constraint.
 
(have a theta: θ and a phi: φ :wink:)

i think you're missing the obvious …

using coordinates θ and φ, you already have X = cot(θ/2)cosφ, Y = cot(θ/2)sinφ …

so change one of the coordinates again! :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
(have a theta: θ and a phi: φ :wink:)

i think you're missing the obvious …

using coordinates θ and φ, you already have X = cot(θ/2)cosφ, Y = cot(θ/2)sinφ …

so change one of the coordinates again! :smile:


Uhm...ah yes! maybe I got what you were trying to tell me :)
Darn, you were just suggesting me to use the geometrical definition of 'cotangent'. This way everything becomes almost trivial.

Actually now that I think about it, the cotangent operator itself does a stereographic projection of the 1-sphere onto the real line. Stupid me.

I think I missed it because I tried to directly work on the stereographic projection for the n-sphere.
 
he he! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
602
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K