Finding the minimum area of a triangle

Click For Summary
To find the minimum area of a triangle formed by points A=(1,0,1) and B=(1,-1,0) with a third point on the line L:(x,y,z) = (t,t,t), the area can be calculated using the formula 1/2||BAxBC||. The discussion highlights that the area is minimized when the third point is closest to the line segment AB, which involves determining the perpendicular distance from line L to segment AB. Concerns about the possibility of t canceling out in calculations are addressed, confirming that it does not cancel. The focus remains on optimizing the position of the third point to achieve the minimum area.
Null_Pointer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
So i have the points A=(1,0,1) and B=(1,-1,0) and the third corner lies on the line
L:(x,y,z) = (t,t,t) and i need to find a triangle with the minimum area possible.

My initial approach was to calculate the vector BA and BC and then apply both vectors in the area triangle formula 1/2||BAxBC|| = area and then find a t that gives me the minimum area, but then I am wondering if this is correct since there may be a possibility that t can be canceled out and I'm left with a constant that comes from the derivate of the cross product.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a simpler way, since A,B are fixed points, the area of the triangle is minimum if the third point is closest to AB. This is equivalent to find the distance between L and AB.
 
Null_Pointer said:
So i have the points A=(1,0,1) and B=(1,-1,0) and the third corner lies on the line
L:(x,y,z) = (t,t,t) and i need to find a triangle with the minimum area possible.

My initial approach was to calculate the vector BA and BC and then apply both vectors in the area triangle formula 1/2||BAxBC|| = area and then find a t that gives me the minimum area, but then I am wondering if this is correct since there may be a possibility that t can be canceled out and I'm left with a constant that comes from the derivate of the cross product.
Why would you worry about that possiblity? It doesn't cancel!
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K