MHB Finding the Number of Bit Strings with 8 Zeros and 10 Ones

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bit Strings
alexmahone
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
How many bit strings contain exactly eight 0s and 10 1s if every 0 must be immediately followed by a 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexmahone said:
How many bit strings contain exactly eight 0s and 10 1s if every 0 must be immediately followed by a 1?

Attempt? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
Attempt? (Wondering)

x01x01x01x01x01x01x01x01x

I thought that since there are 9 positions for the 9th 1 and 8 positions for the 10th 1, there would be 9x8=72 strings. But this is just wrong since the 1s are indistinguishable.
 
Alexmahone said:
x01x01x01x01x01x01x01x01x

I thought that since there are 9 positions for the 9th 1 and 8 positions for the 10th 1, there would be 9x8=72 strings. But this is just wrong since the 1s are indistinguishable.

Two scenarios: either one of those x'es is 11 and the others are empty, or 2 of those 9 x'es are 1. (Thinking)
 
My thinking goes like this.

You have ten objects to arrange: (01),(01),(01),(01),(01),(01),(01),(01),1,1

So the answer is $$\dfrac{10!}{8!2!}=45$$
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top