Looking through this matrix approach to the quantum harmonic oscillator,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

http://blogs.physics.unsw.edu.au/jcb/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Oscillator.pdf

especially the equations

[tex]

m \hat{ \ddot { x } } = \hat { \dot {p} } = \frac {i}{\hbar} [ \hat {H} , \hat {p} ]

[/tex]

I'm getting the impression that there's no difference between the time derivative of an operator (of an observable) and the operator representing the time derivative of that observable. That is, between [tex]

\dot { \hat {x } }

[/tex]and[tex]

\hat { \dot {x} }[/tex] Is this true? If so it would mean that, once I knew the position operator matrix for a one-particle system, finding the momentum operator matrix would be simply taking the time derivative of the position matrix (replacing every element of the matrix with its time derivative) and multiplying the whole thing by the mass.

Something tells me that that's too easy and this is just a notation problem in this particular essay, but then I'm new to matrix mechanics.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Finding the operators for time derivatives of observables

Loading...

Similar Threads for Finding operators derivatives |
---|

I Why do we need the position operator? |

I Find the energy from the graph of the wave function |

B Where Can I find the Einstein vs. Bohr Full Debates |

I Find a calculation of Schrödinger's cat experiment? |

B "probability of finding the electron" (teaching QM) |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**