Finding the operators for time derivatives of observables

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the time derivative of an operator and the operator representing the time derivative of that observable in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically the quantum harmonic oscillator. The equation m &hat;{ \ddot { x } } = &hat;{ \dot {p} } = \frac {i}{\hbar} [ \hat {H} , \hat {p} ] illustrates this relationship. It is concluded that while the notation may suggest equivalence, the simplification of deriving the momentum operator matrix from the position operator matrix through time differentiation is not universally valid. The topic is further elaborated in the provided resources, emphasizing the nuances of matrix mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with matrix mechanics
  • Knowledge of operators in quantum physics
  • Basic grasp of time evolution in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the quantum harmonic oscillator in detail
  • Learn about the role of operators in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the concept of time-evolution of expectation values
  • Investigate the implications of the Heisenberg equation of motion
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists working with matrix mechanics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum observables.

snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
Looking through this matrix approach to the quantum harmonic oscillator,

http://blogs.physics.unsw.edu.au/jcb/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Oscillator.pdf

especially the equations

[tex] <br /> m \hat{ \ddot { x } } = \hat { \dot {p} } = \frac {i}{\hbar} [ \hat {H} , \hat {p} ]<br /> [/tex]

I'm getting the impression that there's no difference between the time derivative of an operator (of an observable) and the operator representing the time derivative of that observable. That is, between [tex] <br /> \dot { \hat {x } }<br /> [/tex]and[tex] <br /> \hat { \dot {x} }[/tex] Is this true? If so it would mean that, once I knew the position operator matrix for a one-particle system, finding the momentum operator matrix would be simply taking the time derivative of the position matrix (replacing every element of the matrix with its time derivative) and multiplying the whole thing by the mass.

Something tells me that that's too easy and this is just a notation problem in this particular essay, but then I'm new to matrix mechanics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K