Finding the orders of 1, 2, .... , 16 (mod 17)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kitty Kat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    number theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on finding the orders of integers from 1 to 16 modulo 17, utilizing Euler's Theorem. The key findings indicate that the order, t, must be a divisor of φ(17), which equals 16. The calculated orders for specific integers are: n=1 (t=1), n=2 (t=8), n=4 (t=4), and n=5 (t=16). The discrepancy between the user's results and the textbook's answer key is attributed to the book considering a different question regarding the existence of solutions based on the greatest common divisor with 9.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with Euler's Theorem
  • Knowledge of the Euler's Phi Function, φ(n)
  • Basic skills in number theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Euler's Phi Function, φ(n)
  • Learn about modular exponentiation techniques
  • Explore the concept of orders of elements in modular arithmetic
  • Investigate the implications of gcd in modular equations
USEFUL FOR

Students of number theory, mathematicians interested in modular arithmetic, and anyone studying Euler's Theorem and its applications in finding orders of integers.

Kitty Kat
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


09a665408f471be471c142d306160d84.png

So basically for n ∈ {1, ... , 16}
Find the lowest t to satisfy nt ≡ 1 (mod 17)

Homework Equations


Euler's Theorem tells us that the order, t, must be a divisor of φ(17), which is Euler's Phi Function.
φ(17) = 16
t ∈ {1, 2, 4, 8, 16}

The Attempt at a Solution


n = 1
11 ≡ 1 (mod 17)
t = 1

n = 2
I checked 22 and 24 by hand and they weren't congruent to 1 (mod 17).
28 = 64 ≡ 1 (mod 17)
t = 8

n = 4
I checked 42 by hand and it wasn't congruent to 1 (mod 17).
44 = 256 ≡ 1 (mod 17)
t = 4

n = 5
516 = (16 * 16) ≡ 1 (mod 17)
t = 16

My answers seem to be quite different from the answer key, and I'm not sure why.
Also, my textbook's answer key implies that only 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8 actually have a solution; so is there a quick way to verify for which n there is a solution? (Other than checking all the values of t, and finding that none of them satisfy the congruence.)

I know that gcd(n, m) = 1 will have a solution, but 17 is a prime so gcd(n, 17) for all n {1 ... 16} will be 1, which should imply that all n will have a solution?

Answer key:
e505ede26c437928a083454b9e71294e.png


Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer of the book doesn't make sense, so I did reverse engineering:
If 8 has order 2, then 64=1 mod X, which means X is a divisor of 63 = 7*9. We get the same condition for "2 has order 6" and "4 has order 3".
If 7 has order 3, then X is a divisor of 342 = 2*9*19
If 5 has order 6, then X is a divisor of 15624 = 8*9*7*31.
At this point it gets clear that the book considers X=9.
φ(9) = 6
3 and 6 don't have an order as they share the factor 3 with X=9, all other numbers smaller than 9 are covered in the book's answer. The book simply answers a different question.
 
  • Like
Likes Kitty Kat

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K