Fine Structure Constant - 10 steps

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Garry Goodwin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fine structure constant
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on an alternative method for calculating the fine structure constant (α) based on the proton-electron mass ratio. Specifically, Equation 8, incorporating a delta fudge factor, yields the same value for α as Equation 1. Participants express skepticism about the validity of this approach, questioning whether the delta should indeed be zero and demanding references to professional scientific literature to substantiate the claims. The conversation concludes with a reminder of the forum's rules regarding pre-publication support.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fine structure constant (α) and its significance in physics
  • Familiarity with proton-electron mass ratio calculations
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical equations and their applications in physics
  • Awareness of scientific literature and its role in validating scientific claims
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the fine structure constant in quantum electrodynamics
  • Explore the implications of the proton-electron mass ratio on fundamental physics
  • Investigate the role of fudge factors in scientific calculations and their acceptance in the scientific community
  • Review professional scientific literature on alternative methods for calculating physical constants
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in theoretical physics, and students interested in advanced calculations of fundamental constants will benefit from this discussion.

Garry Goodwin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Alternative calculation for fine structure constant based on the proton / electron mass ratio.
An alternative method to calculate the fine structure constant as a function of the proton \ electron mass ratio. Equation 8 with the delta fudge factor gives the same value for alpha as equation 1 (test it yourself). Delta is close to zero, so if this approach is telling us something about the fine structure constant, maybe delta ought to be zero. Thoughts?
Screenshot 2023-12-09 at 12.17.03.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please post the reference to the professional scientific literature where this calculation is derived.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Vanadium 50 and pinball1970
I'd need to be convinced this is more than numerology to even know where to start. And this looks like numerology with a fudge factor... the possibilities are endless!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, pinball1970 and phinds
Dale said:
Please post the reference to the professional scientific literature where this calculation is derived.
No professional literature that I know.
 
Garry Goodwin said:
No professional literature that I know.
I am sorry, we do not provide any form of pre-publication support. This thread is closed.

You may want to review the forum rules to understand our mission and goals here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K