Fine Structure Constant - 10 steps

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Garry Goodwin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fine structure constant
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an alternative method for calculating the fine structure constant in relation to the proton-electron mass ratio. Participants explore the validity of this approach, particularly focusing on the implications of a "delta fudge factor" in the calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes an alternative method to calculate the fine structure constant, suggesting that the delta fudge factor should ideally be zero if the approach is valid.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism, questioning whether the method is more than numerology and highlighting the arbitrary nature of using a fudge factor.
  • Multiple requests for references to professional scientific literature supporting the calculation are made, with some participants indicating a lack of such references.
  • One participant notes that no professional literature is known to them that supports the proposed calculation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are competing views regarding the validity of the proposed method and the nature of the fudge factor. The discussion remains unresolved with ongoing skepticism about the approach.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the absence of supporting literature and the reliance on a fudge factor, which some participants find problematic. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical or theoretical underpinnings of the proposed method.

Garry Goodwin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Alternative calculation for fine structure constant based on the proton / electron mass ratio.
An alternative method to calculate the fine structure constant as a function of the proton \ electron mass ratio. Equation 8 with the delta fudge factor gives the same value for alpha as equation 1 (test it yourself). Delta is close to zero, so if this approach is telling us something about the fine structure constant, maybe delta ought to be zero. Thoughts?
Screenshot 2023-12-09 at 12.17.03.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please post the reference to the professional scientific literature where this calculation is derived.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Vanadium 50 and pinball1970
I'd need to be convinced this is more than numerology to even know where to start. And this looks like numerology with a fudge factor... the possibilities are endless!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, pinball1970 and phinds
Dale said:
Please post the reference to the professional scientific literature where this calculation is derived.
No professional literature that I know.
 
Garry Goodwin said:
No professional literature that I know.
I am sorry, we do not provide any form of pre-publication support. This thread is closed.

You may want to review the forum rules to understand our mission and goals here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K