Fine structure constant and energy scale

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the fine structure constant and its relationship with energy scales in the context of particle interactions. Participants explore concepts related to vacuum polarization, the effects of energy on electromagnetic interactions, and the implications of measuring the fine structure constant at different distances.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of 'increasing' the energy scale and its implications for the fine structure constant, particularly in relation to accelerating an electron without collisions.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of invariant mass and its relevance to energy scales in particle interactions.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that while velocity is relative, accelerating an electron in a lab context could lead to a greater relative velocity with protons, potentially increasing the electromagnetic interaction.
  • There is a query about the connection between energy scale and the fine structure constant, specifically whether higher energy probes reduce the effects of vacuum polarization and allow access to the 'bare' charge.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion reflects uncertainty and multiple competing views regarding the relationship between energy scales and the fine structure constant. Participants express differing interpretations of how energy affects electromagnetic interactions and the implications for measuring the fine structure constant.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion about the definitions and implications of energy scales, vacuum polarization, and the fine structure constant, indicating a need for further clarification on these concepts.

asimov42
Messages
376
Reaction score
4
Hi all,

I have a rather naive question about the fine structure constant and the relationship between its value and the energy scale involved.

I understand the idea of the a charge being 'screened' by vacuum polarization (i.e., electron-position pairs popping in and out of existence), and that the value of the fine structure constant is approx. 1/137 for a 'dressed' charge at an infinite distance. What I don't understand is what exactly it means to 'increase' the energy scale.

If we were to simply accelerate, say, an electron, to a high velocity (without smashing it into anything), would we expect the electromagnetic interaction with a passing proton to be stronger, since the electron has more kinetic energy? This doesn't seem right, since velocity is relative. Or does the energy scale only matter in a collision?

I guess I'm not really clear on the meaning of energy scale; when other posts refer to the energy scale as increasing at shorter distances, does this mean the value of the fine structure constant would effectively be different when measured 'near' the electron?

Sorry if this has already been dealt with - I searched through the archives but wasn't able to find an answer to these specific questions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Certainly velocity is relative but if you are on a lab and you accelerate very much an electron, probably the protons will have a speed "similar" to the lab and therefore the relative velocity between the electron and the proton will be big. In that case, since the electron comes to the proton with a higher speed, the coulomb force needed to repel the electron will be greater and the interaction as well.
 
By the way, what has this to do with the fine structure constant??
 
tom.stoer said:
The relevant energy scale is the invariant mass M² = P² where P is the sum over the 4-momenta of all particles involved in a process; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupling_constant

Thanks Tom - I'm still a bit foggy though... from other reading, I surmise that as the energy scale increases, greater momentum transfer is involved. Does this mean that by using a higher energy probe, one gets closer to the 'bare' charge (i.e., there's less screening by vacuum polarization, since the interactions are occurring over shorter distances)? Not sure if that makes sense.

Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K