Finishing my story

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the completion of a short story titled "Mosasaur Summer," which is 4,300 words long. The author is contemplating whether to directly resolve the action of the climax or to skip ahead to the character resolution. The narrative features two main characters, a teenager and their Great Mother, who have experienced a significant adventure culminating in a chase. The author is considering the impact of focusing on character development rather than plot resolution, questioning if their writing style is too straightforward or lacks sufficient backstory. Feedback from reviewers has been mixed, with one suggesting a more action-oriented approach, while the author aims for a reflective tone. The consensus suggests writing both resolutions to gain deeper insights into the characters, emphasizing that short stories require a careful balance between action and character development.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,886
Reaction score
7,915
I've written a(nother) short story, Mosasaur Summer, this one a mere 4,300 words.

I've gotten all the way to the end of the climax and now I don't know how I should finish it. I'm trying to decide if I should write out the direct resolution to the action, or if I should skip ahead to the character resolution itself.

There's only two characters, a young teenager and their Great Mother, who have just been on a wild adventure together that culminates in a chase and calamity that will save the day. What I don't know is if I should assume the day was saved extra scaenam (i.e. off-screen) and dissolve directly to the character reckoning.

If I understand correctly, the reason one might do this is to keep the focus on the characters - which is presumably what the core of a good story is about - not on the plot/action.

I just can't seem to write it.

I wonder sometimes if my stories are too direct, too stripped down. i.e. too little back story or side-story, so that there is insufficient hooks remaining need tying up.

Throwing this out there in the faint hope of breaking my block.

I've sent it to a couple of friends for review but haven't gotten much feedback (One of my reviewers wants everything to be a full-blown action story, beginning-to-end. What I'm going for is more of a glib 'so that happened' vibe, told in retrospect, from the teen's POV).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write both and choose. Write the direct resolution scene first, because it will tell YOU something more about the characters. Then write the character resolution.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Rive and DaveC426913
DaveC426913 said:
I wonder sometimes if my stories are too direct, too stripped down.
Short stories are just right that way, IMO. 3-4-5000 words length won't give you much wiggle room.

Action or characters - @Frabjous is right: I've seen it working both ways, but never seen it working without the feeling that the other one was also properly written...
 
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
2
Replies
96
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Back
Top