MHB Finite Tangent product / quotient

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the identity involving the tangent function for real numbers and odd integers. It establishes that the ratio of tangent functions can be expressed as a product of specific tangent terms derived from the roots of the equation $\tan(m\theta) = \tan(mz)$. The proof utilizes the formula for $\tan(m\theta)$, which is based on de Moivre's theorem, and involves manipulating the roots to arrive at the desired equation. Participants acknowledge the elegance of the approaches used, particularly in relation to complex numbers. Overall, the thread emphasizes the mathematical derivation and its implications in trigonometric identities.
DreamWeaver
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
Just for fun, eh...? (Heidy)For $$z \in \mathbb{R}$$, and $$m \in 2\mathbb{N}+1$$, show that:$$\frac{\tan mz}{\tan z}=\prod_{j=1}^{ \lfloor m/2 \rfloor } \tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}+z\right) \tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}-z\right) $$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]The numbers $\theta = \frac{j\pi}{m}+z \ (-\lfloor m/2 \rfloor \leqslant j \leqslant \lfloor m/2 \rfloor)$ are the roots of the equation $\tan(m\theta) = \tan(mz).$ The formula for $\tan(m\theta)$ (for an odd number $m$) in terms of $t = \tan\theta$ is $$\tan(m\theta) = \frac{{m\choose1}t - {m\choose3}t^3 + {m\choose5}t^5 - \ldots + (-1)^{\lfloor m/2 \rfloor}t^m} {1 - {m\choose2}t^2 + {m\choose4}t^4 - \ldots + (-1)^{\lfloor m/2 \rfloor}{m\choose m-1}t^{m-1}}.$$ So the equation obtained by putting that expression equal to $\tan(mz)$ has roots $\tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}+z\right) \ (-\lfloor m/2 \rfloor \leqslant j \leqslant \lfloor m/2 \rfloor).$ Multiply out the fraction and the equation becomes $(-1)^{\lfloor m/2 \rfloor}t^m + \ldots - \tan(mz) = 0.$ The product of the roots is the constant term divided by the coefficient of $t^m.$ Therefore $$\prod_{j=-\lfloor m/2 \rfloor}^{\lfloor m/2 \rfloor} \tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}+z\right) = (-1)^{\lfloor m/2 \rfloor}\tan(mz).$$ Now divide by the middle term of the product and pair off the remaining factors to get $$ (-1)^{\lfloor m/2 \rfloor}\frac{\tan(mz)}{\tan z} = \prod_{j=1}^{ \lfloor m/2 \rfloor } \tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}+z\right) \tan\left(z - \frac{j\pi}{m}\right).$$ Finally, change the sign of the second of each of those pairs of factors. That will introduce $\lfloor m/2 \rfloor$ changes of sign, which will cancel with those on the left side of the equation and result in $$\frac{\tan mz}{\tan z}=\prod_{j=1}^{ \lfloor m/2 \rfloor } \tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}+z\right) \tan\left(\frac{j\pi}{m}-z\right).$$[/sp]
 
@ Opalg...

I used the standard definition of the tangent function in complex terms,

$$\tan \theta = \frac{e^{i\theta}- e^{-i\theta}}{ e^{i\theta}+ e^{-i\theta}}$$But your approach is far more elegant. Very nicely doen indeed! (Yes)
 
DreamWeaver said:
@ Opalg...

I used the standard definition of the tangent function in complex terms,

$$\tan \theta = \frac{e^{i\theta}- e^{-i\theta}}{ e^{i\theta}+ e^{-i\theta}}$$But your approach is far more elegant. Very nicely doen indeed! (Yes)
The formula that I used for $\tan(m\theta)$ comes straight from de Moivre's theorem, of course, so the complex numbers were definitely there in the background.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
841
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K