The discussion centers around the concept of a finite universe and the implications of viewing all timelines within it. Participants explore the nature of the universe, the Big Bang, and the possibility of an external space beyond the universe.
Participants express disagreement on the nature of the universe and the implications of a finite versus infinite framework. There is no consensus on the validity of the speculative ideas presented.
Some claims rely on personal speculation and may not align with established cosmological theories. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of space and the Big Bang that are not universally accepted.
There is no "outside of the universe" regardless of whether it is infinite or finite so your question has no answer.Vivek des said:Say i move far away from the whole universe (Finite universe-assumed) Is it possible for me to look into all timeline of universe? Where the time (4th dimension)will just be a spatial dimension? Help me with a finite universe idea ..
You are mistaken. The universe is everything there is. Period.Vivek des said:The whole universe which we assume everything is must lie somewhere in a vast space.Where only nothingness remains which might not belong to our definition of universe. Why can't i just call it as an infinite space in which we (the universe) is finite?
I do get that.. I am not sure if I am right but my assumption is ..whats if Big Bang just produced only finite matter and anti matter. So(covering the fact that matter and anti matter amount should balance) the Big Bang itself had to happen somewhere in emptiness..(That's the reason why we expect matter and anti matter to balance each other).. This region of "Space" not sure if u should say space.. But the medium must have a volume bigger than the volume of matter and anti matter combined ..(classically to hold them) ..Then the matter expands as an after effect of Big Bang ..so by expand we mean it should expand some where in this medium.. So again assuming finite matter in universe there got to be a outside as well.. (Just a hypothesis) help me :)phinds said:You are mistaken. The universe is everything there is. Period.
You are saying the same thing over again. It is still wrong, and as bandersnatch pointed out, such unsupportable personal speculation is against the forum rules.Vivek des said:I do get that.. I am not sure if I am right but my assumption is ..whats if Big Bang just produced only finite matter and anti matter. So(covering the fact that matter and anti matter amount should balance) the Big Bang itself had to happen somewhere in emptiness..(That's the reason why we expect matter and anti matter to balance each other).. This region of "Space" not sure if u should say space.. But the medium must have a volume bigger than the volume of matter and anti matter combined ..(classically to hold them) ..Then the matter expands as an after effect of Big Bang ..so by expand we mean it should expand some where in this medium.. So again assuming finite matter in universe there got to be a outside as well.. (Just a hypothesis) help me :)