Fitting Metal Carbonyls into a 30-Ångstrom Pore: Is It Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TPie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metal
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
Sign up Log in
3 replies · 2K views
TPie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What is the size of iron pentacarbonyl, methylcyclopentadienyl-manganese-tricarbonyl, or dicobalt octacarbonyl? Where could I find a source on this information?

I am aiming to fit the above carbonyls into a 29-34 angstrom pore, but I'd like to know if it's even possible given the size of the molecules.

Wikipedia offers numbers based on a paper published in Inorganic Chemistry in 1977. The Co-Co distances is 2.5 angstroms and the Co-CO appears to be in the area of 1.8 angstroms. Does simple math tell me the diameter is no greater than 6.5 angstroms? How does the size of the atoms come into play?

Thank you in advance!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org

Discussion

Crystal structure database, experimental data from papers, a quantum-chemical calculation, or even a ball-and-stick model.. Depending on how accurate you want it. (not very it'd seem).

But I can say offhand that all those molecules should easily fit into a 30-Ångstrom pore.

6.5 isn't a bad guess. In fact, I'd wager they'd all fit into boxes of 7x7x7 Å.

Even the bulky methylcyclopentadienyl group is only about 5 Å from end-to-end (and it's flat).
 
30 Angstroms is a big pore... but how big is the door?
 
alxm said:
Crystal structure database, experimental data from papers, a quantum-chemical calculation, or even a ball-and-stick model.. Depending on how accurate you want it. (not very it'd seem).

But I can say offhand that all those molecules should easily fit into a 30-Ångstrom pore.

6.5 isn't a bad guess. In fact, I'd wager they'd all fit into boxes of 7x7x7 Å.

Even the bulky methylcyclopentadienyl group is only about 5 Å from end-to-end (and it's flat).

Great. Thank you for the information.