Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around choosing between Florida International University (FIU) and Florida Atlantic University (FAU) for a double major in physics and chemistry, with considerations of specific concentrations such as physical chemistry, astrophysics, or theoretical physics. Participants share their experiences and insights regarding undergraduate programs, campus environments, and research opportunities.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses uncertainty about which concentration to pursue within physics and chemistry.
- Another participant suggests applying to both universities and visiting the campuses to make an informed decision.
- A participant shares their experience at FIU, highlighting the strong community among physics students, various research topics available, and mixed quality of teaching.
- Concerns are raised about the lack of rigorous math requisites at FIU, with specific mention of inadequate preparation in courses like thermodynamics and math methods in physics.
- Some participants mention FAU's reputation in cosmology and general relativity, although details about the undergraduate program remain unclear.
- Another participant notes that FAU has a strong numerical relativity/radiation hydro group, but does not provide insights into the undergraduate experience.
- Concerns about the practical job skills offered by FIU's technical electives and the absence of required programming courses are discussed.
- One participant mentions self-studying physics and math to supplement their education.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a mix of opinions about both universities, with some highlighting strengths and weaknesses of FIU while others focus on FAU's reputation in specific fields. There is no consensus on which university is definitively better for the intended studies.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include varying personal experiences with teaching quality and curriculum rigor, as well as differing perceptions of the universities' strengths in specific areas of study.