Flawed Vector Space Example: Showing Failures of Commutativity and Associativity

miglo
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


let [tex]S={(a_1,a_2):a_1,a_2 \in \mathbb{R}}[/tex] For [tex](a_1,a_2),(b_1,b_2)\in{S}[/tex] and [tex]c\in\mathbb{R}[/tex] define [tex](a_1,a_2)+(b_1,b_2)=(a_1+b_1,a_2-b_2)[/tex] and [tex]c(a_1,a_2)=(ca_1,ca_2)[/tex].
show that this is not a vector space


Homework Equations


vector space axioms


The Attempt at a Solution


this isn't an exercise in the book, but an example from the book that states that commutativity and associativity of addition and the distributive law all fail, so this in fact is not a vector space
i tried working these out and i think i got commutativity one right
because then you have [tex](a_1+b_1,a_2-b_2)[/tex] does not equal [tex](b_1+a_1,b_2-a_2)[/tex] is this correct?
i got stuck on associativity, i worked it out but to me it seems that it does in fact hold true
haven't check the distributive law though
the book I am using is linear algebra by friedberg, insel and spence, second edition
 
on Phys.org
miglo said:

Homework Statement


let [tex]S={(a_1,a_2):a_1,a_2 \in \mathbb{R}}[/tex] For [tex](a_1,a_2),(b_1,b_2)\in{S}[/tex] and [tex]c\in\mathbb{R}[/tex] define [tex](a_1,a_2)+(b_1,b_2)=(a_1+b_1,a_2-b_2)[/tex] and [tex]c(a_1,a_2)=(ca_1,ca_2)[/tex].
show that this is not a vector space


Homework Equations


vector space axioms


The Attempt at a Solution


this isn't an exercise in the book, but an example from the book that states that commutativity and associativity of addition and the distributive law all fail, so this in fact is not a vector space
i tried working these out and i think i got commutativity one right
because then you have [tex](a_1+b_1,a_2-b_2)[/tex] does not equal [tex](b_1+a_1,b_2-a_2)[/tex] is this correct?
Yes, that is correct.

i got stuck on associativity, i worked it out but to me it seems that it does in fact hold true
haven't check the distributive law though
the book I am using is linear algebra by friedberg, insel and spence, second edition
"Associativity of addition" would require that ((a1, b1)+ (a2, b2))+ (a3, b3)= (a1+ b1)+ ((a2, b2)+ (a3, b3)). What do you get for each of those?

Distributivity requires that (a1, b1)((a2, b2)+ (a3, b3))= (a1,b1)(a2,b2)+ (a1,b1)(a3,b3). What do you get for each of those?
 
nevermind i just checked my work again and i think i figured it out
for associativity we end up with
[tex](a_1+b_1+c_1,a_2-b_2-c_2)[/tex] on the left side while the right side gives us
[tex](a_1+b_1+c_1,a_2-b_2+c_2)[/tex]
which aren't equal, so this shows associativity of addition fails right?

im going to work on the distributive law, if i get stuck on that ill post back on this thread for help

first time working with vector spaces, so I am just trying to make sure i get this right before i actually start my linear algebra class in the fall haha
 
miglo said:
nevermind i just checked my work again and i think i figured it out
for associativity we end up with
[tex](a_1+b_1+c_1,a_2-b_2-c_2)[/tex] on the left side while the right side gives us
[tex](a_1+b_1+c_1,a_2-b_2+c_2)[/tex]
which aren't equal, so this shows associativity of addition fails right?
Yes, that is correct.

im going to work on the distributive law, if i get stuck on that ill post back on this thread for help

first time working with vector spaces, so I am just trying to make sure i get this right before i actually start my linear algebra class in the fall haha
 
thanks hallsofivy

looking back into my book I am not even sure if its the distributive law that fails
my book says VS8 fails which is for a,b of elements in F(field) and each element x in V
(a+b)x=ax+bx, is this the distributive law? it doesn't look like the one you posted hallsofivy

anyways i checked it using x,y as the elements of the field
[tex](x+y)(a_1,a_2)=(xa_1+ya_1,xa_2+ya_2)[/tex] and [tex]x(a_1,a_2)+y(a_1,a_2)=(xa_1,xa_2)+(ya_1,ya_2)[/tex]
both sides are not equal so it fails that axiom
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K