Fog Droplet Size as a function of Ultrasound Frequency

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between ultrasonic frequency and the size of water droplets produced by ultrasonic foggers. Participants explore the physics behind droplet generation and seek mathematical descriptions of this relationship, as well as practical applications of ultrasonic fogging technology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Application-focused

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about predicting the size of water droplets produced by ultrasonic frequencies, noting that higher frequencies tend to create smaller droplets.
  • Another participant summarizes that ultrasonic foggers can manipulate droplet size, providing an example of a fogger that creates ~5 micron droplets at 1.75 MHz.
  • A participant shares a link to a specific ultrasonic fogger and mentions its specifications regarding droplet size.
  • There is a discussion about the applications of ultrasonic foggers, particularly in room humidification and decontamination protocols for various settings.
  • One participant describes their intention to demonstrate the effectiveness of dry fogging for decontaminating aircraft and other environments, highlighting its advantages over wet fogging.
  • Additional resources and articles related to ultrasonic fogging and droplet size are provided by another participant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the relationship between ultrasonic frequency and droplet size, but there are varying applications and contexts discussed, indicating multiple perspectives on the use of ultrasonic fogging technology.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to specific frequencies and droplet sizes but lacks detailed mathematical models or comprehensive explanations of the underlying physics. The applications mentioned are context-dependent and may vary in effectiveness based on specific conditions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in ultrasonic technology, applications in decontamination, and the physics of droplet formation in various settings.

Moondog
Messages
14
Reaction score
7
TL;DR
Water driplets (fog, mist) size can be manipulated using ultrasonic frequency such that higher frequencies create smaller diameter particles.
I need to know how to predict particle size of a water driplet produced by a given ultrasonic frequency? For example, an ultrasonic fogger will create ~5 micron water driplets at a frequency of 1.75 MHz. I do know that the higher the frequency the smaller the driplet diameter. How is this relationship described mathematically and what is the physics for how mechanical vibrations actually generate micron-sized particles?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Moondog said:
Summary:: Water driplets (fog, mist) size can be manipulated using ultrasonic frequency such that higher frequencies create smaller diameter particles.

For example, an ultrasonic fogger will create ~5 micron water driplets at a frequency of 1.75 MHz
Do you have any links to descriptions of such foggers?
 
Berkman: House of hydro (https://thehouseofhydro.com/) See dropdown for "Store" tab. Thanks for any help... The FAQs state "House of Hydro ultrasonic water foggers use high output ceramic discs that vibrate 1.7mhz to silently create microscopic (<5 micron) water droplets."
 
Moondog said:
Berkman: House of hydro (https://thehouseofhydro.com/) See dropdown for "Store" tab. Thanks for any help... The FAQs state "House of Hydro ultrasonic water foggers use high output ceramic discs that vibrate 1.7mhz to silently create microscopic (<5 micron) water droplets."
Thanks. What are these used for? Room humidifiers mainly? Is that the application you have in mind?
 
Berkman: I am working to show DoD (and FAA) how dry fogging our patented protocol antibacterial can decontaminate a biologically contaminated aircraft (including sporulating pathogens like anthrax) and return it to clearance standards within 24 yours. We will also expand the use of this protocol to decontaminate hospitality settings, cruise lines, public transportation, hospitals, etc. We've already done this with wet fogging, but dry fogging would be more efficient, effective, and safe for electronics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Thanks Tom. Very interesting and a good starting place.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K