For Republicans: Who would you liek to see become president?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ComputerGeek
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around preferences for potential Republican presidential candidates following George W. Bush's presidency. Participants express their opinions on various candidates, discussing their perceived strengths and weaknesses, as well as the political implications of their potential nominations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express support for John McCain, citing his level-headedness and ability to stand up to Bush.
  • Others prefer Chuck Hagel, noting his conservative stance and a more realistic view on war, though they acknowledge his need for better media presence.
  • A few participants mention Rudy Giuliani as a candidate, with mixed feelings about his appeal and alignment with the religious right.
  • Some express skepticism about Giuliani, labeling him negatively and suggesting he may not appeal to moderates and liberals.
  • There are concerns about any candidate needing to cater to the religious right to secure the Republican nomination, which some participants find troubling.
  • One participant suggests that the best candidate may not necessarily be the most traditionally conservative, but rather one who can address current political pressures.
  • Another participant raises the idea that any candidate who wishes to win the nomination will have to pander to the religious right to some extent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of preferences for candidates, with no clear consensus emerging. There are competing views on the merits of McCain, Giuliani, and Hagel, as well as differing opinions on the influence of the religious right within the Republican Party.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of candidate selection, including the necessity for candidates to appeal to various factions within the party, particularly the religious right, which complicates the discussion of who might be the best candidate.

ComputerGeek
Messages
383
Reaction score
0
Same question to you all. I have no opinion on this one, but after Bush leaves, who would you like to see in office and Why?

Woops... that should be LIKE not liek :-/
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I like McCain. He seems like a level headed good guy and stands up to bush.
 
Is the purpose of this thread to find out who Republicans would like to see elected or to find out which Republican most people would like to see elected?

I prefer Chuck Hagel or John McCain. Both are solidly conservative Republicans, but have a more realistic view about war than Bush has had. Hagel would be my first choice, but he needs to learn how to talk on TV if he wants to stand any chance of even being considered for the nomination.

That doesn't mean I'll definitely be supporting either one. It's entirely possible that Rudy Giuliani just might be the best candidate to ease the pressure that's been building between the two parties. Sometimes, it's more important to have the best president for the times than the best president, generically.
 
Preliminarily, without having looked into either with enough depth just yet, I'd say it's a toss up between Giuliani and Mike Huckabee. Both have their red flags, though.
 
Michael Savage (OK OK I am kidding.) I'd have to go with Rudy Giuliani. McCain is a bit to moderate for my taste.
 
The more I've heard Rudy Giuliani speak these past couple of years, the less and less I like him. He's a slime bag who caters to the religious right and neocons. Moderates and liberals won't go for that.

Of the front runners, the lesser of evils for me would be John McCain.
 
Lou1024 said:
Michael Savage (OK OK I am kidding.) I'd have to go with Rudy Giuliani. McCain is a bit to moderate for my taste.
I never thought I'd hear a reference to Michael Savage here, thanks Lou! You know, it actualy wouldn't be that bad if he was president !
 
Anyone who isn't in cahoots with the Bush administration would be better.
 
  • #10
SOS2008 said:
The more I've heard Rudy Giuliani speak these past couple of years, the less and less I like him. He's a slime bag who caters to the religious right and neocons. Moderates and liberals won't go for that.

Of the front runners, the lesser of evils for me would be John McCain.
It's downright scary. Mitt Romney also has to cater to the religious right. The influence they have developed in the Republican Party within the last decade is very disturbing. Former Republican Senator (and former Episcopal priest) John Danforth has some interesting views on that: St Jack and the Bullies in the Pulpit
 
  • #11
Anybody that wants to win the republican nomination is going to have little choice but to pander to some extent to the religious right, so you've just eliminated every candidate, SOS. If what you want out of Giuliani is the words that please you, I guess you're not going to get that, but it's hard to argue with his results. What he did with the city of New York is the envy of every major city in the US.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
53
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K