MHB For which primes, does the equation have a rational solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Primes Rational
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining for which primes \( p \) the equation \( x^2 + y^2 = 3z^2 \) has a rational solution in \( \mathbb{Q}_p \). It is noted that for all primes \( p \) not dividing \( 2 \) or \( 3 \), there is a rational solution. The conversation highlights the need to show that the equation has no solutions in \( \mathbb{Q}_2 \) and references the Hilbert symbol for evaluating non-trivial solutions. The equation can be reformulated as \( X^2 - Y^2 - 3Z^2 = 0 \), requiring the computation of \( (-1, -3)_p \) to establish the existence of solutions. The discussion suggests consulting Serre's "Course in Arithmetic" for further guidance on this topic.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi! (Smile)

I have to find for which primes $p$, the equation $x^2+y^2=3z^2$ has a rational point in $\mathbb{Q}_p$.

According to my notes:

Obviously, $\forall p \in \mathbb{P}, p \nmid 2 \cdot 3$, there is a rational solution in $\mathbb{Q}_p$.

But,why is it obvious that the equation has a rational solution in $\mathbb{Q}_p,\forall p \in \mathbb{P}, p \nmid 2 \cdot 3 $ ?

Then, it is shown that the equation has no non-trivial solutions in $\mathbb{Q}_3$.Now, I have to show that the equation has no solution in $\mathbb{Q}_2$.

But, how can I do this? :confused: :confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with the Hilbert symbol? Given a field $k$, and $\alpha,\beta$ non-zero elements of $k$ we define $(\alpha,\beta)_k = 1$ if $Z^2 - \alpha X^2 - \beta Y^2 = 0$ has a non-trivial solution, otherwise, we define $(\alpha,\beta)_k = -1$.

Note that your equation can be rewritten as $X^2 - Y^2 - 3Z^2 = 0$. Since you want a non-trivial solution in $\mathbb{Q}_p$ you require that $(-1,-3)_p=0$. It remains to explicitly compute that. I suggest to read chapter-3 in "Course in Arithmetic" by Serre, that tells you exactly how to do it.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top