Forbidden Gamma --> e+e-: Show Conservation Violation

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conservation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The process of gamma rays converting into electron-positron pairs (gamma --> e+e-) is forbidden in empty space due to the violation of conservation laws, specifically linear momentum conservation. Although gamma rays can possess energy exceeding the rest mass energy of an e+e- pair, the absence of a third body, such as a nucleus, prevents the conservation of momentum. This conclusion is supported by Noether's theorem, which relates symmetries and conservation laws in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Noether's theorem
  • Conservation of energy
  • Conservation of linear momentum
  • Understanding of pair production
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Noether's theorem in particle physics
  • Research the conditions required for pair production to occur
  • Explore conservation laws in high-energy physics
  • Examine examples of particle interactions involving third bodies
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers interested in particle physics and conservation laws in high-energy interactions.

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that although gamma rays can have energies greater than the energy of a e+e- pair at rest, the process gamma --> e+e- is forbidden.

Homework Equations



Noether's theorem

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that to show that the process is forbidden, I should be able to show that it violates a conservation principle. But I'm not at all sure what formalism to use for the problem. Can someone give me a nudge in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy may conserved in this process but what other major conserved quantities do we have? HINT: The one that isn't conserved here, you learned about in introductory physics. Remember, the resulting particles are at rest.
 
Ok, so it turns out that I was misreading the problem. All that I need to do (if I am now reading correctly, lol) is to prove that pair production can't occur in empty space! That's not bad at all; the requirements of energy conservation demand that another nucleus be present to absorb some of the photon's linear momentum (without another nucleus, conservation of linear momentum is violated). It's a quick proof. Thanks for the help. Sometimes I just need to actually read my problems more carefully...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K