Forum Game - Where's That Landmark? Part 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forum Game
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread revolves around a forum game where participants identify landmarks based on hints and descriptions provided. The discussion includes various landmarks, personal anecdotes, and playful exchanges among members, with a focus on architectural features and geographical locations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants discuss the accuracy of geographical descriptions related to a landmark, noting discrepancies in distance and direction.
  • One participant shares a mnemonic they created for a landmark's name, which turned out to be based on a mispronunciation.
  • There are claims about the historical accuracy of a town's namesake, with contrasting views on whether the namesake was a general or a town drunk.
  • Multiple participants propose that the landmark in question is The Holy Resurrection Cathedral in Tutaev, Russia, with some affirming this identification.
  • One participant reflects on the repetitive nature of hints given for their landmarks, connecting them to previous discussions and landmarks shared in the thread.
  • Another participant mentions the architectural influence of Louis Kahn and discusses the significance of form and function in landmark design.
  • There are playful comments about the appearance of certain landmarks, likening them to "little Sydney Opera house beings."
  • Hints are provided that suggest a connection to a specific branch of physics, though the exact nature of this connection remains unclear.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the identification of certain landmarks and share personal experiences related to their searches.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on some landmarks, particularly The Holy Resurrection Cathedral, but multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding other landmarks and hints provided throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some hints and descriptions rely on personal interpretations and may not be universally understood. There are references to previous posts and landmarks that may not be accessible to all participants, leading to potential gaps in context.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in architecture, geography, and playful discussions about landmarks may find this thread engaging.

Evo
Staff Emeritus
Messages
24,114
Reaction score
3,277
In order to help with server load, we are splitting up the larger threads.

This is a continuation of the original Where's That Landmark? thread located here

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=270543&page=480
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's been two days now. I'm guessing ImaLooser doesn't know the rule of confirmation, so I'll just continue:

pf.wtlm.2013.04.19.1814.jpg
 
When my friend mentioned this landmark, the name was most alien to me. I didn't have a pen, so I made a mnemonic: "Toe tied". This turned out to be a wrong pronunciation.
She also mentioned it was 350 km NE of of big city. This was also not very accurate, as it looks to be only 250 km away, and way more NNE than NE.
 
My friend says that the wiki entry on how the town got it's name is totally bogus. The namesake man who died was not a general, but the town drunk. Imagine living in a town named after the town drunk, when it's original name was associated with royalty.
 
Is it The Holy Resurrection Cathedral, Tutaev or Tutayev, Russia?
 
fuzzyfelt said:
Is it The Holy Resurrection Cathedral, Tutaev or Tutayev, Russia?

It is!
 
That's unfair. A Russian church actually in Russia. What is this world coming to :-p

Kidding I'm swamped these days.
 
OmCheeto said:
It is!

That was another lovely one to find, thank you, Om, and thank your friend from me, too!
I'll find something.
 
Last edited:
I meant to apologise to Imalooser for not attributing a quote to him or her with a find (Punchbowl falls), in case I was wrong, and I'm pleased Om rectified that. (no hint)
 
Last edited:
  • #10
125m6gw.jpg
 
  • #11
OmCheeto said:
It's been two days now. I'm guessing ImaLooser doesn't know the rule of confirmation, so I'll just continue:

Yes, it is correct.
 
  • #12
fuzzyfelt said:
125m6gw.jpg

It looks like little baby Sydney Opera house beings, who've just woken up, and saying in unison; "Wow! A rectangle!"

Not a clue.
 
  • #13
OmCheeto said:
It looks like little baby Sydney Opera house beings, who've just woken up, and saying in unison; "Wow! A rectangle!"

Not a clue.

:smile:
 
  • #14
OmCheeto said:
It looks like little baby Sydney Opera house beings, who've just woken up, and saying in unison; "Wow! A rectangle!"

Not a clue.
:smile:

It mightn’t be so easy- there could be a trist.
 
  • #15
I’ll mention what I discovered about my last landmark-



fuzzyfelt said:
:) The repetitive hint was of a building at Yale University that Kahn designed and which was named after him, that has an art gallery and is where he taught architecture.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jatiyo_Sangshad_Bhaban

My landmark and hints were more repetitive than it seemed. That last landmark, the Assembly Building by Kahn that I gave had repetitive hints from another recent landmark I gave, The Salk Kahn Institute. I used the triangular ceiling etc., of the Kahn Building at Yale as hints for both Kahn landmarks, e.g. on this page-
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=270543&page=479

But it turns out the last Kahn landmark, The National Assembly building by Kahn had already been a landmark, with Kahn related hints, before, from post no. 2934 -
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2257773

I must have missed the same landmark when it was offered years ago and wasn’t well when I checked.(no hint)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
This is another not very realistic image of the landmark-

95r05t.jpg




And it is difficult to tell there are things like an outdoor pool-

3520sbc.jpg
 
  • #17
"Trist", here, doesn’t refer to someone’s name.

The images so far exclude the landscape at large and, as well, I don’t have a usable indoor image, but it could be something like this-

8lxv.jpg


Something occurred in time possibly somewhere around here.
 
  • #18
Although what has been shown of the landmark so far is recent in the area, it equates with older ideas, like those of form follows function, which have continued on in time, e.g., an internal pool wall takes on oscillating shape like this wall-

34j66c6.jpg


Some landscape images-


bifcw.jpg
30dgjz9.jpg
2zxxr8j.jpg
 
  • #19
The area can be covered in snow around Dec 25, and there are trees close to the landmark.

(Edit: deleted a pink rose.)
 
Last edited:
  • #20
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvk5HfVfTgw
2zxxr8j.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #21
Often, landmarks I give involve a combination of areas of study. Google image placing changes but for me terms from either area could give the landmark: one, by naming the specialty and function in the landmark, or alternatively, by investigating and finding where, roughly, an idea of significance for a different specialty took form. However, googling with a combination of terms from both specialties would probably be easiest to recognise.
 
  • #22
fuzzyfelt said:
Often, landmarks I give involve a combination of areas of study. Google image placing changes but for me terms from either area could give the landmark: one, by naming the specialty and function in the landmark, or alternatively, by investigating and finding where, roughly, an idea of significance for a different specialty took form. However, googling with a combination of terms from both specialties would probably be easiest to recognise.

I do believe, that it will be another 6 months before I figure this out.

You, Fuzzy, must be the namesake of Fuzzy Logic. :-p

---------------------------
ps. I've been all over Banff, Scotland, New Jersey, and a few other places. Only 12 hours of unadulterated web surfing pleasure.
Not sure if I've ever mentioned it before, but thinking, is the best way to travel.
 
  • #23
I have 4 architects in the room. The closest I can come is the A.G. Scientific San Diego Corporate something or other.



Eminating from a comment; "It reminds me of the Tod Williams and Billie Tein design of the California Science Institute"

Fuzzy, does this place exist? :-p
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #24
OmCheeto said:
I do believe, that it will be another 6 months before I figure this out.

You, Fuzzy, must be the namesake of Fuzzy Logic. :-p

---------------------------
ps. I've been all over Banff, Scotland, New Jersey, and a few other places. Only 12 hours of unadulterated web surfing pleasure.
Not sure if I've ever mentioned it before, but thinking, is the best way to travel.


:-p

OmCheeto said:
I have 4 architects in the room. The closest I can come is the A.G. Scientific San Diego Corporate something or other.



Eminating from a comment; "It reminds me of the Tod Williams and Billie Tein design of the California Science Institute"

Fuzzy, does this place exist? :-p

It does really exist – but this is a fairly recent look in the area.

Really, really nice idea, but it isn’t the correct one. Other hints refer to a particular branch of physics, spurrrlash!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #25
fuzzyfelt said:
:-p



It does really exist – but this is a fairly recent look in the area.

Really, really nice idea, but it isn’t the correct one. Other hints refer to a particular branch of physics, spurrrlash!

One of the four architects last night commented; "You're right. Those really do look like little Sydney Opera House babies."

The architect, to whom I've been referring to over the last few months, told the three newbies; "Don't talk to him. He's crazy." :-p
 
  • #26
OmCheeto said:
One of the four architects last night commented; "You're right. Those really do look like little Sydney Opera House babies."

The architect, to whom I've been referring to over the last few months, told the three newbies; "Don't talk to him. He's crazy." :-p

:-p

Another hint, it could involve a psa or a spi or something like that.
 
  • #27
The architect is not very well known, but does credit Kahn as a strong influence. Just for interests sake this is another of his work-
fmkjn.jpg


Also, two to three very well known people visited the area this year for an event slightly related to the landmark, and they could have enjoyed the relaxation the landmark offered.

I will post the rose, which could help with recognising the name of the area.
5ocoit.jpg


b6ybzb.jpg
 
  • #28
The trist or twyst could involve an unnamed, mystery Viennese woman in the 1920s.
 
  • #29
2zzm2qp.jpg



jhu1hi.jpg
 
  • #30
fuzzyfelt said:
:-p

Another hint, it could involve a psa or a spi or something like that.

Ha! I spent quite a few hours looking at Neutrino detectors around the world.
I was going to suggest Gran Sasso the other day, but I can't find the outdoor buildings!
The whole thing is under a mountain.
The images of the topography are very similar to yours.

and:

Underground pool: check!
Tri = Neutrino's have 3 metamorphic states.

And today "christmas at gran sasso" brings up nothing like your landmark.

No more hints though Fuzzy. I'm sure today's clues will allow me to figure this out in the next 3 months. :-p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
721
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K