Fourier Transform of a wavefunction

Click For Summary
The Fourier transform of a wavefunction is used to analyze the wavefunction in momentum space, not to directly obtain probability densities. The wavefunction itself is complex, making it unsuitable as a probability or probability density, which must be real and fall between 0 and 1. For position probability density, the wavefunction is squared and integrated without needing a Fourier transform. The probability density for momentum can then be derived from the Fourier transform of the wavefunction. Thus, the Fourier transform is specifically relevant for momentum analysis, not for calculating position probabilities.
children
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Why shud one take the Fourier transform of a wavefunction and multiply the result with its conjugate to get the probability? Why can't it be Fourier transform of the probability directly?

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wave function can't be a probability (or probability density) since it's complex. A probability must obviously be a real number between 0 and 1.

Also, you you only start by taking the Fourier transform if you're interested in the probability density of a certain value of the momentum. If you're interested in the probability density of a certain value of the position, you don't have to do a Fourier transform.
 
As Fredrick said, you don't take Fourier transform of a wave function in the process of finding the probability density. The probability density is given by (in one dimension):

P(x)=\int\psi (x)^*\psi (x) dx

which does not involve a Fourier Transform.

Instead, the Fourier transform of a wave function will give the wave function in momentum space (call it \phi). Again, as Fredrick mentioned, we can use this to find the probability density for the momentum of the particle:

P(p)=\int\phi (p)^*\phi (p) dp
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K