I Fourier transforms in Hilbert Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter sonnichs
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Fourier transforms within Hilbert spaces, particularly focusing on the representation of functions in classical physics using their Fourier components. It highlights the relationship between sine functions and Dirac delta functions, suggesting that each delta function corresponds to a specific Fourier element. The participant questions whether a reciprocal space for these delta functions can exist within the same Hilbert space, noting that delta functions are distributions rather than traditional functions. A reference to rigged Hilbert spaces is mentioned as a potential explanation for this premise. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of integrating distributions into the framework of Hilbert spaces.
sonnichs
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
I am thinking about the simple Fourier transform: F( sin(nx) ) <--> iπ( δ(ω+n) - δ(ω-n) }
I believe I can represent most of the functions in classical physics, f(x), in a Hilbert space by expressing them using their Fourier components as a basis.
This leads to a spectrum which is represented by the dirac-delta functions. Each axis in the space represents "n" for the delta and its length is the multiplier of the Fourier element of that function.

I can define a reciprocal space for these delta functions, each axis for δ(ω+n) being sin(nx).

I thought that such a space would also exist in the same Hilbert space--but am I incorrect? The delta function does not seem to comply with the rules of elements in a Hilbert space--it is a distribution--not a function?

thanks-Fritz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sonnichs said:
I thought that such a space would also exist in the same Hilbert space--but am I incorrect? The delta function does not seem to comply with the rules of elements in a Hilbert space--it is a distribution--not a function?
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rigged_Hilbert_space.
 
Thank you Gavran. This explains my premise. -FS
 
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K