Free-body diagrams and Newton's laws with a suspended chain

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a suspended chain of three rings, each with a mass of 0.25 kg, subjected to an upward force of 9 N. The key equations derived from Newton's laws include force balance equations for each ring, indicating that the acceleration of each ring is equivalent to the acceleration of the entire chain. The relationship between the heights of the rings is established through differentiation, confirming that the velocities and accelerations are equal for adjacent rings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with free-body diagrams
  • Basic calculus for differentiation
  • Knowledge of force balance equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Newton's second law in multi-body systems
  • Learn about free-body diagram construction for complex systems
  • Explore the concept of rigid body dynamics
  • Investigate the relationship between acceleration and tension in ropes
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of applying Newton's laws in real-world scenarios.

Korisnik
Messages
62
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The chain comprising three rings (each of mass ##0.25kg##) is suspended from a massless rope, and a pulling force ##\left(F=9N\right)## is exerted upwards on the rope. Picture: http://i.imgur.com/xeaiBsc.jpg?1.

I need to find the values of all the unknowns.

Homework Equations


$$a:\ F_y=F_R +w_a=m_aa_a\\
b:\ F_y=F_R+w_b+F_{c,b} =m_ba_b\\
c:\ F_y=F_{b,c}+w_c+F_{d,c} =m_ca_c\\d:\ F_y=F_{c,d}+w_d =m_da_d$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure how to solve the problem without assuming that the acceleration of each ring is equivalent to the acceleration of the whole chain ##\left(a_a=a_b=a_c=a_d\right)##. However, I don't know the law/fact that hypothesis is a consequence of.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Korisnik said:
I'm not sure how to solve the problem without assuming that the acceleration of each ring is equivalent to the acceleration of the whole chain ##\left(a_a=a_b=a_c=a_d\right)##. However, I don't know the law/fact that hypothesis is a consequence of.
Suppose you assign variables to the heights of the rings. Assuming they are rigid, what is the relationship between those variables? What do you get if you differentiate those relationships?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Korisnik
haruspex said:
Suppose you assign variables to the heights of the rings. Assuming they are rigid, what is the relationship between those variables? What do you get if you differentiate those relationships?
Hmm, I think I see what you're trying to say: let ##h_i## be height of body ##i## as a function of time, and ##\Delta h## a constant: then ##h_b=h_c+\Delta h##. Differentiating the equation $$\begin{align}\frac{\mathrm d{h_b}}{\mathrm d{t}}&=\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm d{t}}(h_c+\Delta h)\\ &\Rightarrow v_b=v_c \\&\Rightarrow a_b=a_c.\end{align}$$Did I do it correctly?
 
Korisnik said:
Hmm, I think I see what you're trying to say: let ##h_i## be height of body ##i## as a function of time, and ##\Delta h## a constant: then ##h_b=h_c+\Delta h##. Differentiating the equation $$\begin{align}\frac{\mathrm d{h_b}}{\mathrm d{t}}&=\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm d{t}}(h_c+\Delta h)\\ &\Rightarrow v_b=v_c \\&\Rightarrow a_b=a_c.\end{align}$$Did I do it correctly?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Korisnik

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K