Free Hamiltonian problem for relativistic mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the formulation of the Hamiltonian in relativistic mechanics, specifically the equation $$\hat{H} = (\hat{\tau_3}+i\hat{\tau_2})\frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m_0}+ \hat{\tau_3}m_0 c^2$$. This Hamiltonian is derived from the second-order Klein-Gordon equation to resemble the first-order Dirac equation, incorporating Pauli matrices for convenience. The issue of non-Hermiticity due to the iτ2 term is addressed by modifying the adjoint definition, paralleling the Dirac equation approach. The norm of the wave function is conserved, as shown through the integration of the modified wave function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Pauli matrices and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonian mechanics in quantum physics
  • Basic concepts of Hermitian operators and their significance in quantum theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation from first principles
  • Explore the implications of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the role of adjoint operators in quantum field theory
  • Investigate the physical significance of conserved quantities in relativistic systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in relativistic quantum mechanics and the mathematical formulation of quantum theories.

forhad_jnu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I need to elaborate the equation ,and need to know what is the physical significance and how matrices will manipulate in the equation $$
\hat{H} = (\hat{\tau_3}+i\hat{\tau_2})\frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m_0}+ \hat{\tau_3}m_0 c^2 = \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m_0}
\left| \begin{array}{ccc}
1 & 1 \\
-1 & -1 \\
\end{array}\right| \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m_0} + \left| \begin{array}{ccc}
1 & 0 \\
0 & -1 \\
\end{array}\right| m_0 c^2
$$

Where $$\tau_1 , \tau_2,\tau_3
$$ are Pauli matrices and Hamiltonian comes from "Schrödinger form of the free Klein_Gordon equation
And also why did we added Pauli matrices in the free Hamiltonian ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This equation arises from trying to make the second-order Klein-Gordon Equation look like the first-order Dirac Equation. Define a matrix Ψ = (u v) where u = φ - iħ/mc2 ∂φ/∂t and v = φ + iħ/mc2 ∂φ/∂t. Then Ψ obeys a matrix Schrödinger Equation, iħ∂Ψ/∂t = HΨ where the matrix Hamiltonian H is what you have written. Expressing it in terms of Pauli matrices is just for convenience.

The problem is that H is not Hermitian due to the iτ2 term. What Feshbach and Villars did to fix this was again by analogy with the Dirac Equation. In the Dirac Equation we modified the definition of the adjoint, and instead of ψ† we use ψ ≡ ψ†γ0. Here we use φ ≡ φ†τ3. In terms of this "metric" the norm of ψ is (ψ, ψ) ≡ ∫φ†τ3φ d3x = ∫(u*u - v*v) d3x = iħ/mc2 ∫ (φ* ∂φ/∂t - ∂φ*/∂t φ) d3x, which is the familiar conserved quantity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
425
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K