Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Freedom of speech under attack in SK?

  1. Jan 20, 2009 #1


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    intriguing reports about

    see also for other details on the case:

    What amazes me is that, when a little known unemployed (self-taught) guy who doesn't even have a uni degree can cause so much stir because he made a few accurate predictions...

    I guess if your job is an economist, then you better not make any accurate predictions eh?

    Is this internet censorship gone made? I know it happens a lot in places like China, BUT this does not supposed to happen in the rest of the "free world", or does it?

    I hope I won't get arrested just by posting this. :frown:
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 20, 2009 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Making accurate or inaccurate predictions is exercising freedom of speech.

    Posting false information about the past is spreading lies.

    It was saying that the govenrment had banned major financial institutions and trade businesses from purchasing U.S. dollars in an apparent move to shore up the local currency that got him into trouble. (Of course, it's always possible that it's the government that's lying and they're jailing him to suppress the truth, but, in that case, they're probably lying about him just being an unemployed guy that studied economics on his own.)

    Deliberately posting inaccurate information to manipulate stock prices is as illegal as insider trading. We had a local politician's son pull the same deal. He would give stock advice on a website and, once in a while, would puff up a stock out of the blue or trash a stock out of the blue and he and his partners would cash in. He'd also give his mom some hot tips ahead of time, even though she might not have known what he was doing. He went to jail. She managed to survive politically, but just barely.
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2009
  4. Jan 20, 2009 #3


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    is it possible??:bugeye:.......... guess what :devil::biggrin:
  5. Jan 21, 2009 #4


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    That's different. Those ppl directly profited from the scam. If they didn't profit or no one was harm, I don't see why that's illegal if they just spread their "info" not as the capacity of a politician (or someone with powers/respect) but just a normal blogger. It remains to be seen if the SK blogger profited in any way.

    If the SK govt is correct about this dude's background, then arresting him become even more ridiculuous. I mean, there are millions of people, politicians, activists spreading their opinions, conspiracy theories, lies/truth (intentionally or otherwise) everyday. Should we arrest them all? Most noticeably, should we arrest those who keep making docomentaries (ie. money) or otherwise blogging about the 9/11 conspiracy, for example?

    This is an interesting case, I think, because it may be the next stage of a very strict censorship of the internet. Oh,... Disclaimer: this is just a guess... NOT trying to deliberately spreading lies about internet censorship! :smile:
  6. Jan 21, 2009 #5


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The issue about internet censorship in SK is a valid issue, but I have a hard time seeing Park Dae-sung's case being related to censorship:

    I don't know enough about South Korean culture to judge either case. I find it strange that South Koreans would use the excuse that alledgedly false rumors about government/banking financial policy isn't as serious a flaming someone on the internet. In the US, killing yourself over a cyberspace insult would be considered a huge over reaction to something pretty trivial.

    I also don't know whether the info he was posting was true or false, what his source for the info was, or whether he was profiting or not from some kind of scam. On the surface, it's certainly reasonable to believe the charges against could be valid, even if there's an equal chance he could be innocent of the charges. In today's world, information is as important as currency and intentionally spreading false information to manipulate markets is the equivalent of counterfeiting currency.

    Maybe there's a relationship to Park Dae-sung's case and internet censorship, but I just don't see it unless his rumors are true and the government just doesn't want that info to be revealed publicly.
  7. Jan 21, 2009 #6


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Interesting perspective BobG. But I certainly didn't see it that way. My initial reaction was that should there be only a handful of ppl believed in his advices and hence no significant market movement as a result, I don't even think the SK govt. would have bothered with him at all. So, it seems to me that it was the effect (he has a cult following) and not the cause (ie. the crime of spreading "lies" itself) that really concerned them. Don't you think?

    Of course, we will have no way of finding out who was lying or whether it was deliberate (another key ingredient). Perhaps the SK govt. would also want this case to go public to serve as a warning for other ppl....? :rolleyes:
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Freedom of speech under attack in SK?
  1. Freedom Of Speech (Replies: 6)

  2. Freedom of speech (Replies: 9)

  3. NK attack on SK (Replies: 114)

  4. Freedom of speech (Replies: 55)