Burnsys
- 66
- 0
until revolving doors in the pentagon, congres, oil corporations ,defence industry and mass stops.. american people votes has no effect.
The discussion revolves around the perceived honesty and trustworthiness of George W. Bush, particularly in light of recent controversies and polling data. Participants explore various aspects of Bush's background, including his education, substance abuse, military service, and political career, questioning how these factors contribute to public perception of his integrity. The scope includes political analysis, historical context, and public opinion.
Participants express a range of views regarding Bush's honesty and the implications of his background on his presidency. There is no clear consensus, as some defend his actions while others strongly criticize them.
The discussion includes various assumptions about the reliability of polling data and the interpretation of historical events. Participants rely on differing definitions of honesty and trustworthiness, which may affect their evaluations of Bush's character.
In principle, they're not worse than the Republicans and Democrats, just different - better in some ways, worse in some ways.SOS2008 said:Libertarian seems to be what the Republican party used to be in terms of less government. I like the non-intervention foreign policy. But I believe in fair trade, not free trade. I'm not really sure what the Libertarian stand is on fiscal matters (budget versus pork spending we see now). Who do you see as a Libertarian candidate to vote for in the next presidential election?
In any event, and back to the OP, the corruption has got to go!
Too bad really.jammieg said:That's why they call it "The Bush administration" so that no one particular person or group of people can be held accountable or blamed kinda takes the heat off.