Burnsys
- 66
- 0
until revolving doors in the pentagon, congres, oil corporations ,defence industry and mass stops.. american people votes has no effect.
The forum discussion centers on the declining public perception of George W. Bush's honesty and job performance, highlighted by a July 2005 NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll showing a 49% disapproval rating and only 41% of respondents considering him honest. The conversation delves into Bush's controversial past, including his military service record, substance abuse issues, and misleading statements regarding his DUI arrest and military obligations. The discussion also references significant events during his presidency, such as the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the claims of weapons of mass destruction, which have further fueled skepticism about his integrity and leadership.
PREREQUISITESThis discussion is beneficial for political analysts, historians, journalists, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of political integrity and public trust in leadership during the Bush administration.
In principle, they're not worse than the Republicans and Democrats, just different - better in some ways, worse in some ways.SOS2008 said:Libertarian seems to be what the Republican party used to be in terms of less government. I like the non-intervention foreign policy. But I believe in fair trade, not free trade. I'm not really sure what the Libertarian stand is on fiscal matters (budget versus pork spending we see now). Who do you see as a Libertarian candidate to vote for in the next presidential election?
In any event, and back to the OP, the corruption has got to go!
Too bad really.jammieg said:That's why they call it "The Bush administration" so that no one particular person or group of people can be held accountable or blamed kinda takes the heat off.