From Classical to Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessary knowledge of Classical Mechanics required to effectively study Quantum Mechanics. Participants explore various aspects of Classical Mechanics, including specific formalism and mathematical skills, and how they relate to understanding Quantum Mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a good understanding of Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formalism is essential for grasping Quantum Mechanics.
  • Others argue that knowledge of momentum, angular momentum, and the two-body problem in Classical Mechanics is also important.
  • A participant emphasizes the significance of linear algebra and solving linear ordinary differential equations as critical skills for studying Quantum Mechanics.
  • One participant mentions that understanding classical waves and geometric optics can be beneficial.
  • Another participant points out that while Classical Mechanics knowledge is helpful, it is not strictly necessary to excel in undergraduate Quantum Mechanics if one has a solid foundation in mathematical physics.
  • Concerns are raised about the importance of Schrödinger's equation, noting it is a partial differential equation, which may not be adequately addressed by focusing solely on ordinary differential equations.
  • A participant highlights that many applications of Quantum Mechanics have classical analogs, suggesting that a deeper understanding of Classical Mechanics can enhance comprehension of Quantum Mechanics.
  • Some participants express that while a complete understanding of Quantum Mechanics may not be achievable in an introductory course, there is time to study advanced Classical Mechanics concepts later.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the exact parts of Classical Mechanics necessary for understanding Quantum Mechanics, with multiple competing views on the importance of various concepts and mathematical skills.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the varying definitions of what constitutes a good understanding of Classical Mechanics and the differing opinions on the necessity of specific mathematical techniques.

Joker93
Messages
502
Reaction score
37
What parts of Classical Mechanics must someone know before studying Quantum Mechanics in order to understand the former in all its glory?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Adam Landos said:
What parts of Classical Mechanics must someone know before studying Quantum Mechanics in order to understand the former in all its glory?

For a really good understanding the Hamiltonian and Lagranian formalism. I like Landau's beautiful book that emphasises what is also very important in QM - symmetry:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0750628960/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
bhobba said:
For a really good understanding the Hamiltonian and Lagranian formalism. I like Landau's beautiful book that emphasises what is also very important in QM - symmetry:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0750628960/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Thanks
Bill
Is there a pathway for easily getting the idea behind the things that you mentioned?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Adam Landos said:
Is there a pathway for easily getting the idea behind the things that you mentioned?

IMHO not really.

Its not really a hard book if you know multi-variable calculus. You can do it in a week.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Joker93
Adam Landos said:
What parts of Classical Mechanics must someone know before studying Quantum Mechanics in order to understand the former in all its glory?
The former or the latter?
If the former, you need some of all parts of classical mechanics, otherwise you only have part of its glory.
If the latter, does quantum field theory belong to its glory, as far as you are concerned?
 
O
A. Neumaier said:
The former or the latter?
If the former, you need some of all parts of classical mechanics, otherwise you only have part of its glory.
If the latter, does quantum field theory belong to its glory, as far as you are concerned?
Oh no, i meant the latter!
So, the question is: What must someone know as far as Classical Mechanics are concerned in order to fully understand undergraduate Quantum Mechanics?
 
Adam Landos said:
What must someone know as far as Classical Mechanics are concerned in order to fully understand undergraduate Quantum Mechanics?
Not very much: The Hamiltonian approach to classical dynamics, free motion, the notion of momentum and angular momentum, the 2-body problem. Also useful are the basics about classical waves and the basics of geometric optics.

Far more important is that you have a good command of linear algebra and know how to solve linear ordinary differential equations.
 
A. Neumaier said:
Not very much: The Hamiltonian approach to classical dynamics, free motion, the notion of momentum and angular momentum, the 2-body problem. Also useful are the basics about classical waves and the basics of geometric optics.

Far more important is that you have a good command of linear algebra and know how to solve linear ordinary differential equations.
Could you tell me what kind of linear ordinary differential equations must one know before taking a first QM course? Thanks for the reply by the way
 
Adam Landos said:
what kind of linear ordinary differential equations must one know
At least:
  • single linear ODEs ##\dot y(t)=a(t)y(t)+b(t)##: superposition principle, solution of the homogeneous system via integration, general solution by variation of constants.
  • linear systems with constant coefficients and a driving force, ##\dot y = A y + F(t)##, where ##A## is a square ##n\times n## matrix and ##F(t)## a vector valued function: exponential ansatz, superposition principle, general solution, representation of the solution in terms of the matrix exponential and a corresponding spectral decomposition of the force.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Speaking as an interested layman, I found that Susskind's two books (titled something like The Theoretical Minimum) give you a pretty good introduction and are not too painful. More advanced contributors may disagree.
 
  • #12
Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, especially Poisson brackets and the Hamilton-Jacobi equation.
 
  • #13
Seems like some responder(s) forgot the Schrödinger's equation, (central to undergraduate QM) is a partial differential equation, not an ordinary differential equation. The most common technique for solving SE at the undergrad level, is separation of variables. However, this is not addressing the question, what parts of classical mechanics are necessary.
The more you understand classical mechanics the better. Many QM applications (examples will have classical analogs. To get a proper appreciation of QM you need to be prepared with CM. However, I would say at the undergrad level, if you did not do as well as you might have CM, you might still do well in QM, assuming you have a good grounding in mathematical physics. I qualify this by saying, make sure you repair any defects in CM, as soon as practical.
Caveat and silver lining: Caveat: The (first) course will not give you a complete understanding of undergraduate QM.
Silver lining: By the time you need a complete understanding of undergraduate QM, it will give you time to study the Lagrangian, and Hamiltonian Formulation of classical mechanics. Poisson Brackets, and advanced formalism can usually wait for grad school. Most students seem to find the commutator easier to understand than the classical Poisson Brackets.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
946
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K