# From Classical to Quantum Mechanics

Tags:
1. Jan 12, 2016

### Joker93

What parts of Classical Mechanics must someone know before studying Quantum Mechanics in order to understand the former in all its glory?
Thank you

2. Jan 12, 2016

### bhobba

For a really good understanding the Hamiltonian and Lagranian formalism. I like Landau's beautiful book that emphasises what is also very important in QM - symmetry:
https://www.amazon.com/Mechanics-Third-Edition-Theoretical-Physics/dp/0750628960

Thanks
Bill

Last edited by a moderator: May 7, 2017
3. Jan 12, 2016

### Joker93

Is there a pathway for easily getting the idea behind the things that you mentioned?

Last edited by a moderator: May 7, 2017
4. Jan 12, 2016

### bhobba

IMHO not really.

Its not really a hard book if you know multi-variable calculus. You can do it in a week.

Thanks
Bill

5. Jan 12, 2016

### A. Neumaier

The former or the latter?
If the former, you need some of all parts of classical mechanics, otherwise you only have part of its glory.
If the latter, does quantum field theory belong to its glory, as far as you are concerned?

6. Jan 12, 2016

### Joker93

O
Oh no, i meant the latter!
So, the question is: What must someone know as far as Classical Mechanics are concerned in order to fully understand undergraduate Quantum Mechanics?

7. Jan 12, 2016

### A. Neumaier

Not very much: The Hamiltonian approach to classical dynamics, free motion, the notion of momentum and angular momentum, the 2-body problem. Also useful are the basics about classical waves and the basics of geometric optics.

Far more important is that you have a good command of linear algebra and know how to solve linear ordinary differential equations.

8. Jan 13, 2016

### Joker93

Could you tell me what kind of linear ordinary differential equations must one know before taking a first QM course? Thanks for the reply by the way

9. Jan 13, 2016

### A. Neumaier

At least:
• single linear ODEs $\dot y(t)=a(t)y(t)+b(t)$: superposition principle, solution of the homogeneous system via integration, general solution by variation of constants.
• linear systems with constant coefficients and a driving force, $\dot y = A y + F(t)$, where $A$ is a square $n\times n$ matrix and $F(t)$ a vector valued function: exponential ansatz, superposition principle, general solution, representation of the solution in terms of the matrix exponential and a corresponding spectral decomposition of the force.

Last edited: Jan 14, 2016
10. Jan 13, 2016

### sandy stone

Speaking as an interested layman, I found that Susskind's two books (titled something like The Theoretical Minimum) give you a pretty good introduction and are not too painful. More advanced contributors may disagree.

11. Jan 16, 2016

### Keith_McClary

12. Jan 17, 2016

### MrRobotoToo

Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, especially Poisson brackets and the Hamilton-Jacobi equation.

13. Jan 17, 2016

### mpresic

Seems like some responder(s) forgot the Schrodinger's equation, (central to undergraduate QM) is a partial differential equation, not an ordinary differential equation. The most common technique for solving SE at the undergrad level, is separation of variables. However, this is not addressing the question, what parts of classical mechanics are necessary.
The more you understand classical mechanics the better. Many QM applications (examples will have classical analogs. To get a proper appreciation of QM you need to be prepared with CM. However, I would say at the undergrad level, if you did not do as well as you might have CM, you might still do well in QM, assuming you have a good grounding in mathematical physics. I qualify this by saying, make sure you repair any defects in CM, as soon as practical.
Caveat and silver lining: Caveat: The (first) course will not give you a complete understanding of undergraduate QM.
Silver lining: By the time you need a complete understanding of undergraduate QM, it will give you time to study the Lagrangian, and Hamiltonian Formulation of classical mechanics. Poisson Brackets, and advanced formalism can usually wait for grad school. Most students seem to find the commutator easier to understand than the classical Poisson Brackets.