From physics how can we figure out how old the earth and the universe is?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around methods for determining the age of the Earth and the universe, with a focus on the role of physics in these calculations. Participants explore various scientific techniques, including radiometric dating and stellar evolution models, while addressing questions from a newcomer to science.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • A participant shares their background as a former creationist and expresses a desire to learn about scientific methods for determining the age of the Earth and universe.
  • One response suggests that answering the question thoroughly would require extensive information, providing links to Wikipedia articles for further reading.
  • Another participant explains that while the age of the solar system can be estimated through radiometric dating of asteroids, determining the age of other stars is more complex and relies on theoretical models of stellar evolution.
  • It is noted that the brightness, temperature, and mass of stars are key variables in estimating their ages, but these estimates carry significant uncertainty.
  • A claim is made that radioactive dating indicates the Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old, though this is not universally accepted without further discussion.
  • Participants mention resources like TalkOrigins for addressing creationist claims, suggesting that these questions have been previously explored.
  • One participant proposes that measuring the acceleration of the universe could provide insights into its age, although this point is repeated and met with a comment questioning the clarity of the expression.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the methods for determining ages, with some agreeing on the validity of radiometric dating while others highlight the uncertainties in stellar age estimates. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best methods and interpretations of the data.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the topic, including the limitations of current models and the reliance on theoretical frameworks for estimating stellar ages. There is also a recognition of the need for further clarification on certain points raised.

dcderek24
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
i am a former creationist that is just learning about science. I am not trying to disprove anything i just want to learn. i was hid away from science all my life growing up in a fundamentalist household and church.
anway i have learned about radiometric dating and various ways scientists can figure out how old the Earth is.
what about through physics?
how through physics can we figure out the age of a star and the age of things of the universe including earth.

i greatly appreciate any answers in advance. I am also being bomboarded with creationist questions by my friends or old friends and family. and i just like to know for my own curiosity.
 
Space news on Phys.org
The ages of stars are a bit more complicated. For our own solar system, it's pretty easy, because we can just check the ages of asteroids using radiometric dating. This gives us a good estimate for the age of our own Sun as well.

But there are no direct methods for detecting the ages of other stars, unfortunately. Instead, we rely largely upon model estimates. The basic way this is done is to compare three variables: brightness, temperature, and mass. Main sequence stars stay about the same mass for most of their life after formation. But the brightness and temperature change as the star ages: the star becomes gradually brighter and hotter as it ages. So if the star is in a multiple-star system that allows us to measure its mass, then we can use the relationship between how bright/hot it is and its mass to give us an estimate of the age.

To get an idea of how the age depends upon this relationship, we have to use theoretical models of stellar evolution. It's unfortunate that we only really have one strong data point to confirm our theories (our own Sun). Partly because of this, our estimates of the ages of individual stars are extremely uncertain. Interestingly enough, we have a better handle on the age of the universe itself than we have on the ages of individual stars!

Anyway, you can read more on how stars age here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_evolution
 
Radioactive dating is a very powerful tool for determining Earth's age. All such studies strongly indicate Earth is about 4.5 billion years old.
 
You need to know the http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs.html" archive. This is not exactly the very first time those questions have been asked and answered.
If some specific questions remain, ask here at PF.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ich said:
You need to know the http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/faqs.html" archive. This is not exactly the very first time those questions have been asked and answered.
If some specific questions remain, ask here at PF.
Ah, yes, talkorigins is fantastic for debunking a wide variety of creationist claims. I particularly like the FAQ and the "post of the month" series.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the universe they can measure the speed of exceleration, taking in mind that the universe is speeding up, and can measuse when it began :)
 
nickthrop101 said:
the universe they can measure the speed of exceleration, taking in mind that the universe is speeding up, and can measuse when it began :)

Please tell me English isn't your first language...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K