I Frontiers in Physics had 2 papers quest. Bell's theorem, any othrs?

ndvcxk123
Messages
47
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
My understanding is that other "Frontiers" Journals have been criticized for lax review policies. Am in another field, so I cannot judge the papers myself. Sorry, don't have refs., assume they are well known.
One is fr. worker at U. Karlsruhe, another fr. Israeli res. The latter argued findings can be integrated into classical physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's kind of hard for people here to judge papers, without links or references to them, or even the names of their authors.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and vanhees71
ndvcxk123 said:
assume they are well known….
Sorry, bad assumption.

This thread is closed. You can start a new when you have links to the papers.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and vanhees71
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top