I Frontiers in Physics had 2 papers quest. Bell's theorem, any othrs?

ndvcxk123
Messages
47
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
My understanding is that other "Frontiers" Journals have been criticized for lax review policies. Am in another field, so I cannot judge the papers myself. Sorry, don't have refs., assume they are well known.
One is fr. worker at U. Karlsruhe, another fr. Israeli res. The latter argued findings can be integrated into classical physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's kind of hard for people here to judge papers, without links or references to them, or even the names of their authors.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and vanhees71
ndvcxk123 said:
assume they are well known….
Sorry, bad assumption.

This thread is closed. You can start a new when you have links to the papers.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and vanhees71

Thread 'Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
View full post »

Thread 'Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation'

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
View full post »

Thread 'How strong is the justification for low probability extreme thermal fluctuations?'

I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Bell's theorem claimed to be refuted - paper published by EPL
2
Replies
50
Views
6K
I Is Bell's Theorem Inconsistent with Quantum Mechanics?
2
Replies
55
Views
8K
I Looking For Help Understanding Bell's Theorem, Hidden Variables & QM
2
Replies
80
Views
7K
B The match rates in Bell Tests -- Lower than 50%?
Replies
28
Views
2K
Bell's theorem mathematical content
Replies
35
Views
4K
I Bell's Theorem - why product of (2)spins can be +1 (Griffith's text)
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Bell vs Kolmogorov: Unravelling Probability Theory Limits
2
Replies
93
Views
7K
I Born rule as an axiom or as a theorem?
Replies
7
Views
2K
B Why do photon polarization experiments show similar outcomes in different situations?
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Bell's theorem and Superdeterminism
Replies
16
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top