I Frontiers in Physics had 2 papers quest. Bell's theorem, any othrs?

ndvcxk123
Messages
47
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
My understanding is that other "Frontiers" Journals have been criticized for lax review policies. Am in another field, so I cannot judge the papers myself. Sorry, don't have refs., assume they are well known.
One is fr. worker at U. Karlsruhe, another fr. Israeli res. The latter argued findings can be integrated into classical physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's kind of hard for people here to judge papers, without links or references to them, or even the names of their authors.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and vanhees71
ndvcxk123 said:
assume they are well known….
Sorry, bad assumption.

This thread is closed. You can start a new when you have links to the papers.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and vanhees71

Thread 'Importance of Hanbury Brown and Twiss experiment'

I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
View full post »

Thread 'Prof Mike Wiest's proposed link between quantum and consciousness'

I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
View full post »

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Similar threads

I Bell's theorem claimed to be refuted - paper published by EPL
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
I Is Bell's Theorem Inconsistent with Quantum Mechanics?
2
Replies
55
Views
8K
I Looking For Help Understanding Bell's Theorem, Hidden Variables & QM
2
Replies
80
Views
7K
B The match rates in Bell Tests -- Lower than 50%?
Replies
28
Views
2K
Bell's theorem mathematical content
Replies
35
Views
4K
I Bell's Theorem - why product of (2)spins can be +1 (Griffith's text)
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Bell vs Kolmogorov: Unravelling Probability Theory Limits
2
Replies
93
Views
7K
I Born rule as an axiom or as a theorem?
Replies
7
Views
3K
B Why do photon polarization experiments show similar outcomes in different situations?
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Bell's theorem and Superdeterminism
Replies
16
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top