FRW Metric in d Dimensions: Can I Expand?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on expanding the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric into d spatial dimensions. The proposed metric transformation involves incorporating the scale factor \( a(t) \) into all spatial terms to maintain isotropy. Participants reference a paper titled "Higher Dimensional FRW String Cosmological Models in a New Scalar-tensor Theory of Gravitation," which explores the addition of a fifth dimension using a term \( A^2(t) d\mu \) instead of \( R^2(t) \). The consensus is that isotropy must be preserved in the extra dimensions for the expansion to be valid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric
  • Familiarity with general relativity and cosmological models
  • Knowledge of scale factors in cosmology
  • Basic concepts of higher-dimensional theories in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of isotropy in higher-dimensional cosmological models
  • Study the mathematical formulation of the FRW metric in different dimensions
  • Examine the paper "Higher Dimensional FRW String Cosmological Models in a New Scalar-tensor Theory of Gravitation"
  • Learn about the role of scale factors in cosmological dynamics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, cosmologists, and researchers exploring higher-dimensional models and the implications of isotropy in cosmological metrics.

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
I was wondering if I can expand the FRW metric in d spatial dimensions, like:g_{\mu \nu}^{frw} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & - \frac{a^2(t)}{1-kr^2} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & - a^2(t) r^2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -a^2 (t) r^2 \sin^2 \theta \end{pmatrix} \rightarrow g_{MN} = \begin{pmatrix} g_{\mu \nu}^{frw} & 0 \\ 0 & - 1_{(d-3) \times (d-3)} \end{pmatrix}

Or should I insert a ##-a^2 (t) ## for the rest too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't seen the FRW metric discussed for a different number of dimensions, but I would think the scale factor would have to be present in all the spatial terms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChrisVer
PeterDonis said:
I haven't seen the FRW metric discussed for a different number of dimensions, but I would think the scale factor would have to be present in all the spatial terms.
Agreed. You would break isotropy otherwise unless I am not thinking straight... For isotropy to hold, the FRW metric in spherica coordinates should be pretty straight forward to generalise - just replace ##d\Omega^2## by the metric for the appropriate unit sphere.

This of course relies on the assumption tha you want to be isotropic also in the extra dimensions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChrisVer
I think you are right. I found a paper
"Higher Dimensional FRW String Cosmological Models in a New Scalar-tensor Theory of Gravitation" where they added a fifth dimension in FRW with a term A^2(t) d \mu instead of R^2(t) to the original 3 spatial dimensions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K