Galaxy MoM-z14 - furthest observed object

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

MoM-z14 is the most distant known galaxy, discovered on 16 May 2025, with a redshift of z = 14.44, indicating its formation occurred approximately 280 million years after the Big Bang. This galaxy, observed using the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), exhibits a mass of 108 solar masses and underwent significant star formation around 13.53 billion years ago. The discovery of MoM-z14 highlights the capabilities of JWST in identifying and confirming distant galaxies, surpassing previous telescopes like Hubble.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of redshift and its significance in cosmology
  • Familiarity with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and its observational capabilities
  • Knowledge of the Reionization Era in the early universe
  • Basic concepts of galaxy formation and stellar evolution
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of redshift in cosmological studies
  • Explore the capabilities and technology of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)
  • Investigate the Reionization Era and its role in cosmic history
  • Learn about the characteristics and formation processes of early galaxies
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students interested in cosmology, particularly those focusing on galaxy formation and the early universe.

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,498
Reaction score
7,420
MoM-z14 is the most distant known galaxy. Discovered on 16 May 2025 with a redshift of z = 14.44, it is pictured during the galaxy's formation about 280 million years after the Big Bang. As part of the cosmic timeline, MoM-z14 would have been formed during the Reionization Era of the early universe, when neutral hydrogen began ionizing due to radiated energy from the earliest celestial objects.

MoM-z14 is a remarkably luminous and compact galaxy. It has a mass of 108 solar masses making it similar in mass to the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). It appears to have gone through a time of high star formation at the time of our observation from around 13.53 billion years ago, giving off large amounts of ionizing photons, . . . .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoM-z14
MoM-z14 was discovered on 16 May 2025 by Rohan Naidu and 45 co-discoverers, with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). Telescopes launched prior to the JWST did not have mirrors large enough to detect light coming from these distant galaxies.

Any photon with energy above 24.6 eV is going to ionize any atom. K, L X-rays would certainly ionize atoms.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/whats-the-most-distant-galaxy/

The James Webb Space Telescope has found the most distant galaxy ever seen, at the dawn of the cosmos. Again.​

https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news/webb-mom-z14

A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at zspec = 14.44 Confirmed with JWST​

https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11263

Back in 2022, before JWST began science operations, we had only one confirmed galaxy from the first 500 million years of cosmic history: GN-z11, discovered with the Hubble Space Telescope. Several other ultra-distant galaxy candidates existed, but they were just that: candidates. It would take a superior tool, like JWST, to find others, as well as to confirm or refute the ones we already had.


https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/webb...ce-telescope-finds-most-distant-known-galaxy/
https://esawebb.org/images/jades4/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Filip Larsen, gyuray, Greg Bernhardt and 5 others
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Note that some formatting was lost in the quote above. The mass of the galaxy is about 108 solar masses, not 108.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gyuray
Drakkith said:
Note that some formatting was lost in the quote above. The mass of the galaxy is about 108 solar masses, not 108.
Copying the text did not capture the superscript. It has been corrected
 
Several other ultra-distant galaxy candidates existed, but they were just that: candidates. It would take a superior tool, like JWST, to find others, as well as to confirm or refute the ones we already had.
Can someone explain this a bit? Is it like we see something or some light but can't yet tell it's a galaxy? What else could it be?
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Can someone explain this a bit? Is it like we see something or some light but can't yet tell it's a galaxy?
It has to do with the resolution of the telescope optical system: collecting sufficient light and focusing that light onto a camera (usually now a digital camera) that has fine enough resolution to distinguish the structure of the observed object.

Back in the 1700s (Messier) recorded nebulae, some of which turned out to be galaxies as opposed to gas/dust clouds in our own galaxy.

The first planetary nebula was observed by Charles Messier in 1764 and was given the
number 27 in his catalog of nebulous objects. The final version of the Messier catalog
of 1784 included four planetary nebulae (PN) together with other nonstarlike objects
such as galaxies and star clusters. The name planetary nebulae was given by William
Herschel, who found that their appearances resembled the greenish disk of a planet.
With better telescope resolution, nebulae that are made up of stars (e.g., galaxies) were
separated from those made up of gaseous material.
Ref: Chapter 1 of Sun Kwok, The Origin and Evolution of Planetary Nebulae, Cambridge University Press, 2000

Greg Bernhardt said:
What else could it be?
Great question. We would expect a type of galaxy based on what we have observed, but as we look back billions of years to what may be close to the origin of the cosmos, the structures might have been different back then.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, gyuray and Greg Bernhardt
Remember the red dots? There was talk of them being a candidate for Z up to 20, PBH, AGNs earliest galaxies possibly.

I cannot find anything now that gives them a Z value of more than 8 or so.

1. “JWST’s little red dots: an emerging population of young, low‑mass AGN cocooned in dense ionized gas”
arXiv:2503.16595 (2025)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc
Thought this part was interesting- even this early no pop III stars:

The presence of oxygen so early in the life of this galaxy is a surprise and suggests that multiple generations of very massive stars had already lived their lives before we observed the galaxy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc
Astronomers at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian have proposed a new explanation for some of the universe’s most puzzling early galaxies, nicknamed “little red dots.”

In the study, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, Authors Fabio Pacucci and Abraham (Avi) Loeb suggest that these galaxies are the result of very slowly spinning dark matter halos, an extremely rare cosmic structure.

These faint, compact objects, discovered in deep space images from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), have challenged scientists’ understanding of how galaxies and black holes formed in the early universe.

Their paper, “Cosmic Outliers: Low-Spin Halos Explain the Abundance, Compactness, and Redshift Evolution of the Little Red Dots,” offers a physical explanation for the dots’ distinctive properties.

“Little red dots are very compact and red distant galaxies that were completely undetected before the James Webb Space Telescope,” said Pacucci. “They are arguably the most surprising discovery by JWST to date. Our work shows that these could naturally form in dark matter halos with very low spin.”
https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/new-theory-may-explain-mysterious-little-red-dots-early-universe

I was thinking about Greg's question about "what else could it be", or what would one expect? Pinball found an article on the JWST "little red dots". Apparently, some are developing a new theory about those little red dots - so, the observations are unexpected, or yet to be explained.

I looked into AGNs
An active galactic nucleus (AGN) is a compact region at the center of a galaxy that emits a significant amount of energy across the electromagnetic spectrum, with characteristics indicating that this luminosity is not produced by the stars. Such excess, non-stellar emissions have been observed in the radio, microwave, infrared, optical, ultra-violet, X-ray, and gamma ray wavebands. A galaxy hosting an AGN is called an active galaxy. The non-stellar radiation from an AGN is theorized to result from the accretion of matter by a supermassive black hole at the center of its host galaxy. The super massive black hole at the center of our Milky Way galaxy is not currently active but it is believed to have been active about 8×109 yr ago.
Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_galactic_nucleus. - the article needs additional citations for verification.

https://science.nasa.gov/mission/we...e-explainers/what-are-active-galactic-nuclei/
https://esahubble.org/wordbank/active-galactic-nucleus/
https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/a/Active+Galactic+Nuclei

I also wondered about quasars.

https://news.colby.edu/story/webb-telescope-sharpens-understanding-little-red-dots/
As Pinball pointed out, many/most are Z < 8, although NGDEEP 4321 has Z = 8.92, so we would need more samples 9 < Z < 14.44

https://science.nasa.gov/missions/w...-indicate-early-black-hole-growth-webb-finds/

This also raises the question about how the different space telescopes could be coordinated. They wold have to look at the same piece of sky. Ostensibly, AI could be used to process the data to discern more details of the observed objects/structures.

https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/31208/

With its giant 6.5-meter mirror, JWST is the most powerful telescope yet launched into space. Almost immediately, it began to find many more large, mature galaxies than were expected in the infant universe. At first, observers thought the little red dots might also be mature galaxies, which tend to get redder as stars age. But JWST couldn’t resolve the dots into a recognizable shape, which meant they must have been tiny—less than 2% of the diameter of the Milky Way. “It was a mystery … as to why they were so spatially compact,” says Caitlin Casey of the University of Texas at Austin. An impossibly dense packing of stars would be needed to explain their brightness.
Ref: https://www.science.org/content/article/early-universe-s-little-red-dots-may-be-black-hole-stars

What happened to those 'little red dots' Webb observed?​

https://phys.org/news/2025-10-red-dots-webb.html

A Census of Photometrically Selected Little Red Dots at 4 < z < 9 in JWST Blank Fields​

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265

OK, but wait!
https://aasnova.org/2025/08/06/distant-little-red-dot-hosts-a-huge-and-growing-black-hole/
Astronomers have confirmed the discovery of a little red dot galaxy from when the universe was roughly half a billion years old. The galaxy, CAPERS-LRD-z9, is the most distant object to show the tell-tale broad emission lines of gas spiraling around a black hole, opening a new window onto black hole growth in the early universe.

JWST Takes Another Look

CAPERS-LRD-z9 was first identified as a possible high-redshift little red dot when it was observed by the Public Release IMaging for Extragalactic Research (PRIMER) survey with JWST’s Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam). Anthony Taylor (The University of Texas at Austin) and collaborators followed up on the discovery with JWST Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) observations from the CANDELS-Area Prism Epoch of Reionization Survey (CAPERS). This spectrum pinned the object’s redshift at z = 9.288, corresponding to when the universe was only about half a billion years old.

“CAPERS-LRD-z9: A Gas Enshrouded Little Red Dot Hosting a Broad-Line AGN at z = 9.288,” Anthony J. Taylor et al 2025 ApJL 989 L7. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade789

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_red_dot_(astronomical_object)

Discovery of a Little Red Dot Candidate at z > 10 COSMOS-web Based on MIRI-NIRCam Selection​

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ae145f

It appears more observations are needed.

Meanwhile, back in November this year, Science Daily reported "JWST spots a strange red dot so extreme scientists can’t explain it". Z ~ 3.55
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/11/251127102115.htm
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2025/09/aa54681-25/aa54681-25.html
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2025/10/aa55816-25/aa55816-25.html

Over the last two years, scientists have used NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope (also called Webb or JWST) to explore what astronomers refer to as Cosmic Dawn – the period in the first few hundred million years after the big bang where the first galaxies were born. These galaxies provide vital insight into the ways in which the gas, stars, and black holes were changing when the universe was very young. In October 2023 and January 2024, an international team of astronomers used Webb to observe galaxies as part of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES) program. Using Webb’s NIRSpec (Near-Infrared Spectrograph), they obtained a spectrum of a record-breaking galaxy observed only two hundred and ninety million years after the big bang. This corresponds to a redshift of about 14, which is a measure of how much a galaxy’s light is stretched by the expansion of the universe. We invited Stefano Carniani from Scuola Normale Superiore in Pisa, Italy, and Kevin Hainline from the University of Arizona in Tucson, Arizona, to tell us more about how this source was found and what its unique properties tell us about galaxy formation.

“The instruments on Webb were designed to find and understand the earliest galaxies, and in the first year of observations as part of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES), we found many hundreds of candidate galaxies from the first 650 million years after the big bang. In early 2023, we discovered a galaxy in our data that had strong evidence of being above a redshift of 14, which was very exciting, but there were some properties of the source that made us wary. The source was surprisingly bright, which we wouldn’t expect for such a distant galaxy, and it was very close to another galaxy such that the two appeared to be part of one larger object. When we observed the source again in October 2023 as part of the JADES Origins Field, new imaging data obtained with Webb’s narrower NIRCam (Near-Infrared Camera) filters pointed even more toward the high-redshift hypothesis. We knew we needed a spectrum, as whatever we would learn would be of immense scientific importance, either as a new milestone in Webb’s investigation of the early universe or as a confounding oddball of a middle-aged galaxy.

“In January 2024, NIRSpec observed this galaxy, JADES-GS-z14-0, for almost ten hours, and when the spectrum was first processed, there was unambiguous evidence that the galaxy was indeed at a redshift of 14.32, shattering the previous most-distant galaxy record (z = 13.2 of JADES-GS-z13-0). Seeing this spectrum was incredibly exciting for the whole team, given the mystery surrounding the source. This discovery was not just a new distance record for our team; the most important aspect of JADES-GS-z14-0 was that at this distance, we know that this galaxy must be intrinsically very luminous. From the images, the source is found to be over 1,600-light years across, proving that the light we see is coming mostly from young stars and not from emission near a growing supermassive black hole. This much starlight implies that the galaxy is several hundreds of millions of times the mass of the Sun! This raises the question: How can nature make such a bright, massive, and large galaxy in less than 300 million years?
Ref: NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope Finds Most Distant Known Galaxy
https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/webb...ce-telescope-finds-most-distant-known-galaxy/

NASA’s Webb Reaches New Milestone in Quest for Distant Galaxies​

https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/webb...-new-milestone-in-quest-for-distant-galaxies/


See also this post on PF

For scientists wanting access to JADES data.
https://jades-survey.github.io/scientists/
https://jades-survey.github.io/news/. (news is about a year behind at this time)
https://jades-survey.github.io/about/. <--read this
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
Astronuc said:
https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/new-theory-may-explain-mysterious-little-red-dots-early-universe

I was thinking about Greg's question about "what else could it be", or what would one expect? Pinball found an article on the JWST "little red dots". Apparently, some are developing a new theory about those little red dots - so, the observations are unexpected, or yet to be explained.

I looked into AGNs

Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_galactic_nucleus. - the article needs additional citations for verification.

https://science.nasa.gov/mission/we...e-explainers/what-are-active-galactic-nuclei/
https://esahubble.org/wordbank/active-galactic-nucleus/
https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/a/Active+Galactic+Nuclei

I also wondered about quasars.

https://news.colby.edu/story/webb-telescope-sharpens-understanding-little-red-dots/
As Pinball pointed out, many/most are Z < 8, although NGDEEP 4321 has Z = 8.92, so we would need more samples 9 < Z < 14.44

https://science.nasa.gov/missions/w...-indicate-early-black-hole-growth-webb-finds/

This also raises the question about how the different space telescopes could be coordinated. They wold have to look at the same piece of sky. Ostensibly, AI could be used to process the data to discern more details of the observed objects/structures.

https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/31208/


Ref: https://www.science.org/content/article/early-universe-s-little-red-dots-may-be-black-hole-stars

What happened to those 'little red dots' Webb observed?​

https://phys.org/news/2025-10-red-dots-webb.html

A Census of Photometrically Selected Little Red Dots at 4 < z < 9 in JWST Blank Fields​

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ad4265

OK, but wait!
https://aasnova.org/2025/08/06/distant-little-red-dot-hosts-a-huge-and-growing-black-hole/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_red_dot_(astronomical_object)

Discovery of a Little Red Dot Candidate at z > 10 COSMOS-web Based on MIRI-NIRCam Selection​

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ae145f

It appears more observations are needed.

Meanwhile, back in November this year, Science Daily reported "JWST spots a strange red dot so extreme scientists can’t explain it". Z ~ 3.55
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/11/251127102115.htm
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2025/09/aa54681-25/aa54681-25.html
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2025/10/aa55816-25/aa55816-25.html


Ref: NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope Finds Most Distant Known Galaxy
https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/webb...ce-telescope-finds-most-distant-known-galaxy/

NASA’s Webb Reaches New Milestone in Quest for Distant Galaxies​

https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/webb...-new-milestone-in-quest-for-distant-galaxies/


See also this post on PF

For scientists wanting access to JADES data.
https://jades-survey.github.io/scientists/
https://jades-survey.github.io/news/. (news is about a year behind at this time)
That may take a while to read @Astronuc !
 
  • #10
Greg Bernhardt said:
Can someone explain this a bit? Is it like we see something or some light but can't yet tell it's a galaxy? What else could it be?
From the context, it seems to me that what they're trying to confirm or refute isn't whether they are galaxies or not, but whether or not they are ULTRA-DISTANT galaxies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
416
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K