Gears in Transmission: How to Improve Performance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of gear transmissions, specifically focusing on the relationship between gear sizes on the layshaft and their impact on performance, torque, and acceleration. Participants explore theoretical implications and practical considerations in mechanical advantage and gear ratios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if the gears on the layshaft were the same radius as the first gear on the red shaft, the transmission could perform better by allowing the blue gear to rotate more for each revolution of the layshaft.
  • Another participant counters that the purpose of the transmission is to provide mechanical advantage, allowing the engine to operate efficiently within its power band at lower speeds.
  • A different viewpoint proposes that a larger red gear could lead to a more powerful first gear, providing the same torque as before but with improved acceleration.
  • One participant compares the transmission to a bicycle, noting that having a combination of small and large sprockets can reduce driver effort, especially on steep hills, and questions why all gears on the layshaft cannot be maximized in size.
  • Another participant challenges the bicycle analogy, stating that in a bicycle with multiple gears, all gears move regardless of engagement, which complicates the comparison.
  • A participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the bicycle analogy and reiterates the point about the benefits of a larger red gear for torque and acceleration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of gear size on performance and the mechanics of transmission design. No consensus is reached regarding the optimal configuration of gears on the layshaft.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss assumptions about mechanical advantage, torque relationships, and the operational mechanics of bicycles versus gear transmissions, indicating potential limitations in their analogies and reasoning.

R Power
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi PFians and friends

transmission-5speed-gears.gif


Have a look at this basic transmission.

I was wondering if the gears on the layshaft somehow remain of same radius as the first gear on layshaft (I know then the mechanism has to be different), then won't be our transmission better. e.g consider the case of 1 gear( smallest gear on shaft red or layshaft and largest blue gear on yellow shaft) , here for one revolution of layshaft the blue gear will rotate very less (which will depend on gear ratio), but if the red gear here were as big as the first gear on red shaft(which takes power from engine), then the blue gear would turn more.
So shouldn't transmissions be designed such that the gears on layshaft remain of same maximum radius possible.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
R Power said:
here for one revolution of layshaft the blue gear will rotate very less
That's the whole point of having a transmission in the first place. The mechanical advantage of the blue gear turning less is what allows the engine to remain in its power band at lower vehicle speeds.
 
but if the red gear is made large, then we will get a powerful first gear which will provide same torque as in above case and more acceleration in first gear.because torque to drive shaft is dependent upon blue gears and the speed of rotation on red gears
 
Last edited:
compare it to a bicycle having gears at front and rear sprockets. In this case at front ,options for a small sprocket (first gear front) are present in combination with a large sprocket at rear (similar case as of above transmission) , but this is because having a smaller sprocket at the front will reduce driver effort. That's the advantage in case of steep hills.
But in the above transmission, all the small and big gears on layshaft are not driven individually(as in bicycle) but are on a single shaft. So, the engine has to bear the load of rotating the big gears (no matter which gear is engaged), because engine will rotate whole red shaft. So, why not all gears be of same "maximum" possible size. Because doing this although lead in same torque(because torque to drive shaft is dependent upon blue gears and the speed of rotation on red gears) but better acceleration.
 
R Power said:
But in the above transmission, all the small and big gears on layshaft are not driven individually(as in bicycle) but are on a single shaft.

Your notion of the bicycle is wrong. Turn a bicycle with multiple gears upside down and turn the pedal with your hand. Every single gear moves, whether it is engaged or not.
 
yeah, i was wrong in case of bicycle. I apolozise if it seemed to have someone in confusion.

But what about this:
but if the red gear is made large, then we will get a powerful first gear which will provide same torque as in above case and more acceleration in first gear.because torque to drive shaft is dependent upon blue gears and the speed of rotation on red gears
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
8K