GEBRA: Representation and Operations of Matrices - FAQs

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rollcast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the representation and operations of matrices, specifically addressing notation and calculation methods. It clarifies that while various bracket types can be used to represent matrices, straight lines should be avoided as they are typically reserved for determinants. The common notation for determinants is det(A), although using delta (Δ) is acceptable if clearly defined. For matrix inverses, both placing 1/det in front of the matrix and multiplying it into the matrix are valid, but the latter is recommended for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix notation and representation
  • Knowledge of determinant calculation methods
  • Familiarity with matrix inversion techniques
  • Basic mathematical notation conventions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research standard matrix notation practices in linear algebra
  • Learn about determinant calculation using det(A) notation
  • Study methods for calculating the inverse of matrices
  • Explore the implications of different notations in mathematical communication
USEFUL FOR

Students studying linear algebra, mathematics educators, and anyone involved in mathematical notation and matrix operations.

rollcast
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
I'm just revising my maths notes on matrices and I have a couple of questions, mainly about representation of matrices.

1. I have drawn the matrices in my notes with square brackets, curved brackets or straight lines and curved ends. I always just copied what the slide show or board notes had up at the time.

Is it preferable to draw matrices with one type of bracket around them compared to another?

2. When calculating the determinant of the matrix I have used delta, Δ, to represent the det. of the matrix but I can't find reference to the use of delta anywhere else?

3. When writing the inverse of a matrix I haven't divided the entities of the matrix by the determinant. I have just writing it as 1 / det. and put this in front of the matrix?

Is this correct or should I get rid of the 1/det. by multiplying it into the matrix?

Thanks
AL
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rollcast said:
I'm just revising my maths notes on matrices and I have a couple of questions, mainly about representation of matrices.

1. I have drawn the matrices in my notes with square brackets, curved brackets or straight lines and curved ends. I always just copied what the slide show or board notes had up at the time.

Is it preferable to draw matrices with one type of bracket around them compared to another?

This doesn't matter that much. All are used. However, I advize you not to use straight lines as this might be used for the determinant.

2. When calculating the determinant of the matrix I have used delta, Δ, to represent the det. of the matrix but I can't find reference to the use of delta anywhere else?

This is indeed not a common notation. Commonly, the notation det(A) is used. Using delta isn't wrong, but you must state clearly that it signifies the determinant.

3. When writing the inverse of a matrix I haven't divided the entities of the matrix by the determinant. I have just writing it as 1 / det. and put this in front of the matrix?

Is this correct or should I get rid of the 1/det. by multiplying it into the matrix?

Both are ok. However, multiplying it into the matrix is cleaner.
 
Thanks Micro, I looked back and the straight line ones where determinant.

The use of delta must be set by the exam board as its used on their mark scheme solutions for matrix questions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K