High School What Surprised Geiger in the Gold Foil Experiment on Atom Structure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pvnrt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Gold
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The gold foil experiment, conducted by Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden, revealed that the atom's structure is not consistent with the plum pudding model. Instead of scattering significantly, most alpha particles passed through the gold foil, indicating that atoms contain a small, dense nucleus with a positive charge, contrary to the belief that mass was uniformly distributed. This experiment demonstrated that the nucleus contains multiple positive charges, specifically 79 in the case of gold, which was a groundbreaking realization in atomic theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the plum pudding model of atomic structure
  • Familiarity with alpha particle interactions
  • Knowledge of electrostatic forces and the inverse square law
  • Basic principles of atomic theory and structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical context and implications of the gold foil experiment
  • Study the concept of atomic nuclei and their charge distribution
  • Learn about the development of quantum mechanics following the gold foil experiment
  • Explore the differences between the plum pudding model and Rutherford's nuclear model
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching atomic theory, and anyone interested in the historical development of scientific understanding of atomic structure.

pvnrt
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm confused a little about the gold foil experiment.
I tried to put myself in Geiger's shoes, the author of the experiment.
I'm firing alpha particles at a gold film, given that the plum pudding model is the pinnacle of human understanding of the atom, meaning I believe matter is made of indivisible particles - amorphous, negatively charged pieces of mass, containing electrons, which neighbour one another, why would I expect all the alpha particles to be able to pass through the gold relatively undisturbed rather than the vast majority of them bouncing off due to the multilayer obstacle of gold plum pudding atoms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At that time, they didn't think that matter contained any atomic-sized, basically point, positive charges (that also contained a relatively sizable mass) that would be able to repel or scatter the alpha particles. If the positive charge were more uniformly distributed, (as in the plum pudding model), the scattering would not occur. They also would not have guessed that these point positive charges would contain not only one positive charge, but in the case of gold, 79 positive charges, localized almost to a point. (It may also be worth pointing out that the scattering that occurs is due to electrostatic forces which are long range, (with inverse square law), rather than some kind of interaction due to the mass of the particles).
 
Last edited:
pvnrt said:
why would I expect all the alpha particles to be able to pass through the gold relatively undisturbed rather than the vast majority of them bouncing off due to the multilayer obstacle of gold plum pudding atoms?
It isn't clear what you mean here. You would (well, I would) expect some interaction and scattering for all incident particles if you assumed that the mass of the atom is spread about within the volume it appears to occupy, The actual experimental result was a surprise because it was only a tiny proportion of the particles that were affected to any degree. The model of all the mass in the centre was revolutionary but it was needed in order to explain the results.
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon and Charles Link
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
18K