General question about floating/sinking objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter astonmartin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the principles of buoyancy, specifically regarding objects that hover at different depths in water. It is established that an object's ability to float or sink is determined by its density relative to the water. When an object hovers at 10 feet versus 20 feet below the surface, the primary difference lies in the slight increase in water density due to pressure and temperature changes at greater depths. While these factors may affect the object marginally, a rigid object with the same density as water should maintain its position regardless of depth. Overall, the differences are subtle and primarily related to the physical properties of water at varying depths.
astonmartin
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Ok so I understand that whether an object floats or sinks depends on its density vs the density of the solution, and an object that neither floats nor sinks (sorta hovers in the middle) probably has the same density as the solution.

My question is: is there any difference between an object that "hovers" 10 ft below the surface of the water vs one that reaches equilibrium 20ft below (neither touching the bottom of course)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi astonmartin! :smile:
astonmartin said:
… is there any difference between an object that "hovers" 10 ft below the surface of the water vs one that reaches equilibrium 20ft below (neither touching the bottom of course)?

Not really …

the extra pressure might crush it a little, so that might change its volume,

but water itself is generally taken to be incompressible, so a rigid object with the same density as water should "hover" at whatever depth you carefully place it. :smile:
 
astonmartin said:
Ok so I understand that whether an object floats or sinks depends on its density vs the density of the solution, and an object that neither floats nor sinks (sorta hovers in the middle) probably has the same density as the solution.

My question is: is there any difference between an object that "hovers" 10 ft below the surface of the water vs one that reaches equilibrium 20ft below (neither touching the bottom of course)?

Water is slightly denser at that depth, a tiny bit due to compression and a bit more due to its temperature, which falls off rapidly with depth. That might make a difference, but a subtle one.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
634
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K